Empathy Effects on Antecedent Salience and Anaphor Processing in Japanese

Author:

Shoji ShinichiORCID,Sokolovsky JesseORCID

Abstract

Purpose. The present study investigates whether antecedent saliency is affected by empathy status. That is, the possibility that when the speaker of a sentence empathizes with an entity, called the empathy locus, that entity is more salient than other entities. Accordingly, reduced forms of anaphors would be preferred to fuller forms when referring to an empathy locus. Methods. Two self-paced reading experiments were conducted using two-sentence discourses. Sentence 1 contained empathy-locus and non-empathy-locus antecedents. These were then referred to by fuller and reduced forms of anaphors in Sentence 2. The empathy statuses of the antecedents were indicated by Japanese ‘giving’ verbs, which obligatorily express the empathy locus. Results. Analyses of sentential reading-time results showed a significant interaction of antecedents and anaphors. Sentences 2 were read faster when the anaphors were reduced forms (i.e., null pronouns) than when they were fuller forms, but the reading-speed difference was significantly neutralized when the antecedents were non-empathy loci. Also, this significant neutralization appeared only when the anaphors were overt pronouns (not when they were repeated names) and when the anaphors were not marked by the topic morpheme. Conclusions. The outcomes indicate that empathy-locus antecedents are more salient than non-empathy-locus ones, which affects the choices of fuller or reduced forms of anaphors. Also, the results imply that Japanese overt pronouns may carry anti-logophoricity, which would cause them to avoid referring to empathy loci. In addition, the results imply that the topic’s inherent function, which is to refer to an entity that has previously appeared, may nullify the difference which results from antecedent saliency.

Publisher

Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference47 articles.

1. Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psycholinguistic Review, 106, 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.748

2. Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clinton Jr., C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica, 14, 1–19.

3. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge.

4. Arnold, J.E. (1998). Reference form and discourse patterns. [Doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.

5. Baayen, R.H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3