Affiliation:
1. Westmont College, Department of Kinesiology, USA
Abstract
<div>Pyrotechnic seat belt pretensioners typically remove 8–15 cm of belt slack and
help couple an occupant to the seat. Our study investigated pretensioner
deployment on forward-leaning, live volunteers. The forward-leaning position was
chosen because research indicates that passengers frequently depart from a
standard sitting position. Characteristics of the 3D kinematics of
forward-leaning volunteers following pretensioner deployment determines if body
size is correlated with subject response. Nine adult subjects (three female),
ages 18–43 years old, across a wide range of body sizes (50–120 kg) were tested.
The age was limited to young, active adults as pyrotechnic pretensioners can
deliver a notable force to the trunk. Subjects assumed a forward-leaning
position, with 26 cm between C7 and the headrest, in a laboratory setting that
replicated the passenger seat of a vehicle. At an unexpected time, the
pretensioner was deployed. 3D kinematics were measured through a nine-camera
motion capture system with reflective markers on the left and right glabella,
tragus, manubrium, C7, lateral proximal head of humerus, olecranon process,
patella, and lateral malleolus. For uniformity, all pretensioners were of the
same model made by Autoliv and were dual systems (having deployment in the
retractor and outbound anchor). The initial velocity of the trunk (first 50 ms)
was dependent on the body size, with smaller subjects getting pulled back
quicker. Following the first ~160 ms, there was a slight rebound where subjects
briefly moved forward, followed by a period of high intersubject variance in
movement. By isolating the effects of pyrotechnic pretensioner deployment on
live volunteers, this study fills in an important gap in automotive safety
research and may help with evaluating computer models or designing future
restraint systems with advanced sensor technology where pretensioners deploy
prior to significant vehicle deceleration.</div>
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Human Factors and Ergonomics,General Medicine
Reference17 articles.
1. ADAM ,
T. &
UNTAROIU ,
C.D. 2011 Identification of occupant posture using
a Bayesian classification methodology to reduce the risk of injury in a
collision Transportation Research Part C: Emerging
Technologies 19 6 1078 1094
2. BOHMAN ,
K. , &
FREDRIKSSON ,
R. 2014 Pretensioner loading to rear-seat
occupants during static and dynamic testing Traffic
Injury Prevention 15 Suppl 1 111 118 https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.936935
3. BOSE ,
D. &
CRANDALL ,
J.R. Influence
of active muscle contribution on the injury response of restrained car
occupants Ann Adv Automot
Med. 2008 52 61 72
4. BOSE ,
D. ,
CRANDALL ,
J.R. , &
UNTAROIU ,
C.D. ,
MASLEN
E.H. 2010 Influence of pre-collision occupant
parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision Accid Anal Prev. 42 4 1398 1407
5. CHARLTON ,
J. ,
KOPPEL ,
S. ,
KOPINATHAN ,
S. , &
TARANTO ,
D. 2010 How do children really behave in
restraint systems while traveling in cars? Annu Adv
Automot Med 54 181 192