A New Methodology for Comparing Knock Mitigation Strategies and Their Stability Margin

Author:

Mitchell Robert,Conway Graham,Wang Yanyu

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The automotive sector is rapidly transitioning to decarbonized, electric vehicles solutions. However, due to challenges with such rapid adoption, Internal combustion engines (ICE) are expected to be used for decades to come. In this transition period it is important to continue to improve ICE efficiency. A key design parameter to increase ICE efficiency is the compression ratio. For gasoline engines, the compression ratio is limited so as to avoid knock. Engine designers can employ several strategies to mitigate knock and enable higher compression ratios. In this study, a new methodology has been developed to compare various knock mitigation strategies. By comparing the knock limited load at a given combustion phasing the expected compression ratio increase can be inferred. Knock mitigation techniques examined in the paper include coolant temperature, manifold temperature, start of injection, split fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and water injection, both port and direct. Critically, a knock mitigation technology should not excessively compromise the combustion stability. This methodology includes a test for the combustion phasing at a 5% coefficient of variation (CoV) of the net indicated mean effective pressure (nIMEP). The difference between the CA50 at the knock limited load and the stability limited is noted as the stability margin. It is critical for designers and engineers to insure that an engine operates within both the knock and stability boundaries. Different strategies for knock mitigation affect knock and stability differently. The proposed methodology provides an efficient yet accurate way to quantify the impact of technologies. For example, EGR provides a significant increase in knock limited load but also decreases the stability margin by increasing ignition requirements. Water injection, on a per volume basis, provided a smaller increase in knock limited load but has a smaller impact on combustion stability.</div></div>

Publisher

SAE International

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3