Evaluation of Occupant Kinematics and Kinetics during Moderate Severity Simulated Frontal Impacts with and without Frontal Airbag Deployment

Author:

Sharpe Sarah S.,Grijalva Sandra,Allin Leigh,Courtney Amy,Toney-Bolger Megan,Pokutta-Paskaleva Anastassia,Crosby Charles L.,Carhart Michael

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Airbag and seat belt pretensioner deployment characteristics depend on multiple factors, such as the magnitude, direction, and rate of vehicle deceleration as detected by vehicle crash sensors and evaluated by vehicle-specific algorithms. Frontal airbag and pretensioner deployments are likely to be commanded during frontal crash events with high initial vehicle deceleration typically associated with high vehicle change in velocity (delta-V). However, within a range of moderate changes in vehicle speeds, referred to as the “gray zone,” a vehicle-specific algorithm may or may not command deployment depending on crash pulse parameters and occupant sensing, among other items. Publicly available testing in the moderate-speed range is lacking and would be useful to evaluate the effects of airbag and pretensioner deployment on occupant kinematics and loading. In this study, sled tests were performed using a standard passenger vehicle buck simulating frontal deceleration impact events in a “gray-zone” severity of 19 kph (12 mph) delta-V and in a typical deployment severity of 32 kph (20 mph) delta-V. Matched sled tests were performed with and without airbag deployment with instrumented Hybrid III 50th percentile anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) properly belted in the driver and front passenger seats. Additionally, one paired test was conducted at 19 kph with and without pretensioner deployment in the presence of airbag deployment. Airbag deployment for the 19 kph delta-V tests did not significantly affect occupant kinematics or loading compared to the non-deployment tests, while some differences were apparent for the 32 kph delta-V tests. In all tests, injury metrics were well below applicable injury assessment reference values (IARVs).</div></div>

Publisher

SAE International

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3