Affiliation:
1. Virginia Tech, Center for Injury Biomechanics
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Frontal-crash sled tests were conducted to assess submarining protection and
abdominal injury risk for midsized male occupants in the rear seat of modern
vehicles. Twelve sled tests were conducted in four rear-seat vehicle-bucks with
twelve post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS). Select kinematic responses and
submarining incidence were compared to previously observed performance of the
Hybrid III 50th-percentile male and THOR-50M ATDs (Anthropomorphic Test Devices)
in matched sled tests conducted as part of a previous study. Abdominal pressure
was measured in the PMHS near each ASIS (Anterior Superior Iliac Spine), in the
inferior vena cava, and in the abdominal aorta. Damage to the abdomen, pelvis,
and lumbar spine of the PMHS was also identified. In total, five PMHS underwent
submarining. Four PMHS, none of which submarined, sustained pelvis fractures and
represented the heaviest of the PMHS tested. Submarining of the PMHS occurred in
two out of four vehicles. In the matched tests, the Hybrid III never underwent
submarining while the THOR-50M submarined in three out of four vehicles.
Submarining occurred in vehicles having both conventional and advanced
(pretensioner and load limiter) restraints. The dominant factors associated with
submarining were related to seat pan geometry. While the THOR-50M was not always
an accurate tool for predicting submarining in the PMHS, the Hybrid III could
not predict submarining at all. The results of this study identify substantive
gaps in frontal-crash occupant protection in the rear seat for midsized males
and elucidates the need for additional research for rear-seat occupant
protection for all occupants.</div></div>
Reference36 articles.
1. Adomeit ,
D. Evaluation Methods for the Biomechanical Quality of
Restraint Systems during Frontal Impact Proceeding 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference 1977 3244 3251 Society of Automotive
Engineers
2. Adomeit ,
D. and
Heger ,
A. Motion Sequence Criteria and Design Proposals for Restraint
Devices in Order to Avoid Unfavorable Biomechanic Conditions and
Submarining Proceeding 19th Stapp Car Crash
Conference 1975 3150 3159
3. Bianco ,
S. ,
Guettler ,
A.J. ,
Hardy ,
W.N. ,
Albert ,
D.L.
et al. Evaluation
and Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk for the Hybrid III and THOR
50th-Percentile Male Anthropomorphic Test Devices in the Rear Seat during
Frontal Impacts SAE International Journal of
Transportation Safety 10 2 2022 403 437
4. Bilston ,
L.E. ,
Du ,
W. , and
Brown ,
J. A Matched-Cohort Analysis of Belted Front and Rear Seat
Occupants in Newer and Older Model Vehicles Shows That Gains in Front
Occupant Safety Have Outpaced Gains for Rear Seat
Occupants Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 6 2010 1974 1977
5. Elhagediab ,
A.M. and
Rouhana ,
S.W. Patterns of Abdominal Injury in Frontal Automotive
Crashes Proceeding the 16th International
Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Washington, DC 1998 327 337