Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">In the automotive industry, silicon adhesive has become increasingly popular due to its benefits in ease of assembly and cost savings associated with material and manufacturing processes. To meet the imperative of minimizing both time and expenses during the project's development phase, it becomes essential to select the appropriate gasket material and an optimal flange design at the outset of the design process. In order to achieve stringent emission standards such as Real Driving Emission (RDE) and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) norms, a better sealing performance is an essential parameter. Various types of liquid gaskets such as silicon rubber based Room Temperature Vulcanizing (RTV) sealants and thermoset plastic based Anaerobic sealants are widely used in an Internal Combustion engine. They are commonly used for the components such as oil sump, bedplate, and gearbox housings, etc. Traditional simulation methods could not capture the exact failure modes of the liquid sealants. Hence there is a need for a better understanding of the factors controlling a joint's sealing performance under realistic service conditions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper describes a methodology to predict the sealing performance of liquid sealants at a very detailed level. An innovative 2 Dimensional (2D) and 3 Dimensional (3D) simulation approach is used for micro level modelling of the joint. In the first phase of the simulation, a 2D simulation approach is employed for predicting micro level joint behaviours under various initial conditions. In the second phase, a 3D approach is applied to find the assembly level joining surface behavior. Final sealing performance is evaluated by combining the 2D and 3D simulation results. Experimental validation for the most commonly used liquid gaskets were carried out to establish the correlation of this process. It has been observed that the anticipated sealing outcomes align closely with the results obtained through experimentation.</div></div>
Reference8 articles.
1. Lin , C. ,
Headley , D. , and
Neuenschwander , M. Next Generation Formed-in-Place Gasket (FIPG) Liquid Sealant for Automotive Powertrain Applications SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1478 2008 https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1478
2. Clark , W.H. RTV Silicone Rubber Formed in-Place Gaskets SAE Technical Paper 790349 1979 https://doi.org/10.4271/790349
3. Kreuzer , R. and
Romanos , G. Formed-in-Place Gaskets in Powertrain Applications – Experimental and Numerical Evaluation under Service Conditions SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3353 2006 https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-3353
4. Banea , M.D. ,
da Silva , L.F.M. , and
Campilho , R.D.S.G. Testing of RTV Silicone Adhesives for High Temperature Applications The Annals of “Dunarea De Jos” University of Galati Fascicle XII, Welding Equipment and Technology, (Year XXI) 21 2010
5. Kumbhar , D. ,
Balla , C. , and
Patil , S. Simulation Techniques for Rubber Gasket Sealing Performance Prediction SAE Technical Paper 2021-26-0388 2021 https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-26-0388