Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Today, most vehicles in developing countries are equipped with air conditioning systems that work with Hydro-Fluoro-Carbons (HFC) based refrigerants. These refrigerants are potential greenhouse gases with a high global warming potential (GWP) that adversely impact the environment. Without the rapid phasedown of HFCs under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol and other actions, Earth will soon pass climate tipping points that will be irreversible within human time dimensions. Up to half of national HFC use and emissions are for the manufacture and service of mobile air conditioning (MAC). Vehicle manufacturers supplying markets in non-Article 5 Parties have transitioned from HFC-134a (ozone-safe, GWP = 1400; TFA emissions) to Hydro-Fluoro-Olefin, HFO-1234yf (ozone-safe, GWP < 1; TFA emissions) due to comparable thermodynamic properties. However, the transition towards the phasing down of HFCs across all sectors is just beginning for Article 5 markets. Patents on R-1234yf will soon expire, just as scarcity is likely to drive the price of R-134a to historic highs.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This work consists of two case studies, specific to an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) and an Electric Vehicle (EV). Two different refrigeration system architectures are examined. Both the shortlisted vehicles have different and complex AC system architectures. Complex AC system architectures are selected in this study with the objective of understanding and deploying the learnings in vehicles with less complex and simpler AC system architectures. The ICE vehicle selected for the study has a dual AC configuration with two cooling points (front and rear), using DX architecture. In the EV, an architecture similar to that of the ICE vehicle is deployed for cabin cooling, but unlike the ICE vehicle, it has a secondary coolant-based loop provisioned for battery thermal management. For this study, the baseline HFC-134a refrigerant is replaced by a ‘drop-in’ alternate low-GWP HFO-1234yf refrigerant in both vehicles.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This study focuses on cooling performance evaluation with existing HFC refrigerant and proposed HFO refrigerant for both AC system architectures, gap identification, and proposing common and unique solutions for bridging the performance gaps.</div></div>
Reference14 articles.
1. Navarro-Esbr , J. ,
Mendoza-Miranda , J.M. ,
Mota-Babiloni , A. ,
Barragan-Cervera , A.
et al.
Experimental Analysis of R1234yf as a Drop-In Replacement for R134a in a Vapor Compression System International Journal of Refrigeration 36 2013 870 880
2. Daviran , S. ,
Kasaeian , A. ,
Golzari , S. ,
Mahian , O.
et al.
A Comparative Study on the Performance of HFO-1234yf and HFC-134a as an Alternative in Automotive Air Conditioning Systems Applied Thermal Engineering 110 2017 1091 1100
3. Prasad , U.S. ,
Mishra , R.S. ,
Das , R.K. , and
Soni , H.
Experimental and Simulation Study of the Latest HFC/HFO and Blend of Refrigerants in Vapour Compression Refrigeration System as an Alternative of R134a Processes 11 2023 814 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030814
4. Bolaji , B.O.
et al.
Experimental Study of R152a and R32 to Replace R134a in a Domestic Refrigerator Energy 35 2010 3793 3798
5. Endoh , K. ,
Matsushima , H. , and
Takaku , S.
Evaluation of Cycle Performance of Room Air Conditioner Using HFO1234yf as Refrigerant Int. Refrigerant and Air Cond. Conf., Purdue West Lafayette, IN 2010