Affiliation:
1. Indiana University, O’Neal School of Public & Environmental Policy,
USA
2. Ford Motor Company, Powertrain Engineering (Retired), USA
Abstract
<div>Policy makers generally favor all-electric vehicles over hybrid-electric vehicles
because of greater unit effectiveness in reducing carbon emissions. Since both
systems use lithium-ion batteries, global demand for batteries is projected to
grow 10-fold by 2030. If any step in the global battery supply-chain experiences
bottlenecks, shortages can occur. We use a novel cost-effectiveness metric,
carbon reduction per unit of battery capacity consumed, to rank emissions
reductions accomplished by, alternatively, eight plug-in hybrid-electric
vehicles, 75 hybrid-electric vehicles, and 230 mild hybrid-electric vehicles,
which have the same total battery capacity as one all-electric vehicle. Our main
finding, although counterintuitive, is that, with limited battery supplies,
larger reductions in carbon emissions can be accomplished by hybrids than by
all-electric vehicles. Insofar as carbon emission reduction is the policy goal,
policies need to be reconsidered to ensure that they are not tilted too far in
favor of all-electric vehicles relative to hybrids.</div>
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Engineering (miscellaneous),Aerospace Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference54 articles.
1. EPA
2023 https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/fast-facts-transportation-greenhouse-gas-emissions
2. State of California Air Resources Board
2022
3. CARB
2022 2022 https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/%C2%A7177_states_05132022_NADA_sales_r2_ac.pdf
4. United Nations Environment Programme
2015 2022 Climateinitiativesplatform.org/index.php/Paris-Declaration-on-Electromobility-on-Climate-Change
5. Graham , J.D.
The Global Rise of the Modern Plug-In Electric Vehicle:
Public Policy, Innovation, and Strategy Cheltenham,
UK Elgar House Publishing 2021