Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Powertrain development requires an efficient development process with no rework and model-based development (MBD). In addition, to performance design that achieves low CO<sub>2</sub> emissions is also required. Furthermore, it also demands fuel economy performance considering real-world usage conditions, and in North America, the EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 5-cycle, which evaluates performance in a combination of various environments, is applied. This evaluation mode necessitates predicting performance while considering engine heat flow. Particularly, simulation technology that considers behavior based on engine temperature for Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) is necessary.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Additionally, in the development trend of vehicle aerodynamic improvement, variable devices like Active Grille Shutter (AGS) are utilized to contribute to reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. When equipped with AGS, the engine's heat flow environment also changes, resulting in more complex phenomena in the engine compartment compared to the without AGS. As described above, simulation technology that consider behavior based on engine temperature and the behavior of aerodynamic improvement devices are crucial for identifying trade-offs in vehicle performance.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study, after clarifying the functions and models required to predict the fuel economy of the EPA 5-cycle, an engine thermal plant have been constructed and coupled with vehicle simulation. The vehicle simulation achieved highly accurate EPA 5-cycle fuel economy prediction. Furthermore, a conceptual-level Co-Simulation environment, suitable for early-stage development was utilized to study performance requirements. This was followed by transitioning to a detailed-level Co-Simulation environment that meets the necessary specifications during the mid-term of development. The conceptual-level Co-Simulation environment allows for clarifying the performance requirements of each device in the early stages of development. The detailed-level Co-Simulation environment enables optimization control after determining the hardware specifications in the mid-term of development.</div></div>
Reference20 articles.
1. Wishart , J. and
Secanell , M.
Hybrid Vehicle Nomenclature and Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle Fuel Economy Int. J. Electric and Hybrid Vehicles 2 3 2010
2. Meng , Y. ,
Jennings , M. ,
Schwartz , W. , and
Tsou , P.
System Simulation and Analysis of EPA 5-Cycle Fuel Economy for Powersplit Hybrid Electric Vehicles SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1456 2013 https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1456
3. Broglia , L. , and
Loussaief , S.
Thermal Management Analysis and Range Estimation for Electric Vehicles on EPA 5-Cycle Procedure Using System Simulation 35th International Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS35) Oslo, Norway 2022
4. Broglia , L. ,
Autefage , G. , and
Ponchant , M.
Impact of Passenger Thermal Comfort and Electric Devices Temperature on Range: A System Simulation Approach World Electric Vehicle Journal Vol.5, EVS26 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium 2012
5. Brizard , A. ,
Meillier , R. , and
Broglia , L.
Balancing Vehicle Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort: Benefits of a Multi-Domain System Simulation Approach in the Case of a Power-Split Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Vehicle Thermal Management Systems Conference and Exhibition VTMS10 273 285 2022