Affiliation:
1. Queen's University Belfast
2. Wrightbus
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">In 2022 in the UK, the transport sector was the largest single contributing sector to greenhouse gas emissions, responsible 34% of all territorial carbon dioxide emissions [<span class="xref">1</span>]. In the UK there is growing uptake in zero emission powertrain technologies, with the most promising variants based on battery electric or hydrogen fuel cell electric configurations. Given the limited number of fuel cell electric buses currently in operation in Europe, vehicle models and simulations are one of the few methods available to estimate energy consumption and provide the necessary increased confidence in operating range. This paper investigates the impact of route characteristics, thermal demand and coefficient of performance of different heat source configurations on the operational energy consumption of fuel cell electric buses. Using a MATLAB/Simulink model, the total energy demand of a vehicle operating in different route/elevation profiles is considered. The findings from this study show that implementing a waste heat recovery system, which recovers excess heat produced by the fuel cell system, in a traditional heat pump based HVAC system can reduce the amount of excess fuel consumption required for providing HVAC services by up to 70% over the course of a duty cycle, so long as high levels of waste heat can be recovered. It also shows that through the use of waste heat recovery systems it is possible to replace the heat pump based HVAC system with a much simpler positive temperature coefficient heater system and still achieve or improve upon the performance of a traditional heat pump based HVAC system.</div></div>
Reference23 articles.
1. Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
2023 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1147372/2022_Provisional_emissions_statistics_report.pdf
2. Samsun , R.C. ,
Rex , M. , and
Antoni , L.
2022 10.3390/en15144975 .
3. Hensher , D.A. ,
Wei , E. , and
Balbontin , C.
Comparative assessment of zero emission electric and hydrogen buses in Australia Transp. Res. Part D 102 2022 103130 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103130
4. Logan , K.G. ,
Nelson , J.D. , and
Hastings , A.
Electric and Hydrogen Buses: Shifting from Conventionally Fuelled Cars in the UK Transp. Res. Part D 85 2020 102350 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102350
5. Doyle , D. ,
Harris , A. ,
Chege , S. ,
Douglas , L.
et al.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses: Modelling and Analysing Suitability from an Operational and Environmental Perspective SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1172 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1172