Affiliation:
1. General Motors LLC
2. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
3. University of Michigan
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Level 2 (L2) partial driving automation systems are rapidly emerging in the marketplace. L2 systems provide sustained automatic longitudinal and lateral vehicle motion control, reducing the need for drivers to continuously brake, accelerate and steer. Drivers, however, remain critically responsible for safely detecting and responding to objects and events. This paper summarizes variations of L2 systems (hands-on and/or hands-free) and considers human drivers’ roles when using L2 systems and for designing Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs), including Driver Monitoring Systems (DMSs). In addition, approaches for examining potential unintended consequences of L2 usage and evaluating L2 HMIs, including field safety effect examination, are reviewed. The aim of this paper is to guide L2 system HMI development and L2 system evaluations, especially in the field, to support safe L2 deployment, promote L2 system improvements, and ensure well-informed L2 policy decision-making.</div></div>
Reference83 articles.
1. SAE
2021
2. Cadillac
2023 https://www.cadillac.com/technology/super-cruise
3. Leslie , A.J. ,
Kiefer , R. ,
Flannagan , C. ,
Owen , S.
et al.
2023
4. Consumer Reports
2023 https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-safety/active-driving-assistance-systems-review-a2103632203/
5. Endsley , M.R. and
Kiris , E.O.
The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation Human Factors 37 2 1995 381 394