A Scenario-Based Test Selection and Scoring Methodology for Inclusion in a Safety Case Framework for Automated Vehicles

Author:

O'Malley Gavin1,Wishart Jeffrey2,Zhao Junfeng1,Russo Brendan3

Affiliation:

1. Arizona State University

2. Science Foundation AZ/AZ Comm Authority

3. Northern Arizona University

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Effectively determining automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicle (AV) safety without relying on testing an infeasibly large number of driving scenarios is a challenge with wide recognition in industry and academia. The following paper builds on previous work by the Institute of Automated Mobility (IAM) and Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz), and proposes a test selection and scoring methodology (TSSM) as part of a safety case-based framework being developed by the SFAz to ensure the safety of AVs while addressing the scenario testing challenge. The TSSM is an AV verification and validation (V&V) process that relies, in part, on iterative, partially random generation of AV driving scenarios. These scenarios are generated using an operational design domain (ODD) and behavioral competency portfolio, which expresses the vehicle ODD and behavioral competencies in terms of quantifiable amounts or intensities of discrete components. Once generated, these scenarios are subjected to filters based on their relevance to the AV ODD and behavioral competency portfolio that preserves the robustness of the generated test set; after filtration, scenarios are assigned to a test method and executed. Further, these scenarios may be generated entirely by the TSSM or may be drawn from a preexisting scenario database and subjected to the same filtration process. After the scenarios assembled by the TSSM are executed, the methodology aggregates their driving assessment (DA) scores into a single numerical value. We outline the overall safety case-based framework, the TSSM, including its role in the framework as well as planned future work, and outline two proofs of concept: (1) a demonstration of the ability of the TSSM to pare down the space of scenarios in a scenario database; and (2) a specification form which may be used to solicit a description of the AV ODD and behavioral competency portfolio from the AV developer.</div></div>

Publisher

SAE International

Reference52 articles.

1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2016

2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2017

3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2018

4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2023 https://www.nhtsa.gov/automated-driving-systems/voluntary-safety-self-assessment

5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3