Affiliation:
1. Mercedes-Benz AG
2. Helmut Schmidt University
3. Esslingen University
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The courier express parcel service industry (CEP industry) has experienced significant changes in the recent years due to increasing parcel volume. At the same time, the electrification of the vehicle fleets poses additional challenges. A major advantage of battery electric CEP vehicles compared to internal combustion engine vehicles is the ability to regenerate the kinetic energy of the vehicle in the frequent deceleration phases during parcel delivery. If the battery is cold, the maximum regenerative power of the powertrain is limited by a reduced chemical reaction rate inside the battery. In general, the maximum charging power of the battery depends on the state of charge and the battery temperature. Due to the low power demand for driving during CEP operation, the battery self-heating is comparably low. Without active conditioning of the battery, potential of regenerating energy is partially lost because the friction brake needs to absorb kinetic energy whenever the cold battery’s limit is exceeded. This paper proposes an optimization-based strategy for the battery thermal management of CEP vehicles. The tradeoff between the cost of battery heating and the benefit of regenerative braking is investigated under cold ambient conditions. For this purpose, a nonlinear model predictive control approach is developed to maximize the overall vehicle efficiency depending on the upcoming driving task by selective battery heating. The evaluation shows that the increase in overall efficiency depends on the electric efficiency of the battery heating system, the ambient conditions, the intensity and frequency of the deceleration phases, and the usage behavior of the vehicle. Based on the assumption that the driving cycle and ambient conditions can be accurately predicted, the model-in-the-loop simulation indicates a reduction in energy consumption of up to 3.3 % with an electric coolant heater and up to 9.6 % with an ambient heat pump.</div></div>
Reference29 articles.
1. Esser , K. and
Kurte , J.
2022
2. Röckle , F. ,
Göhler , G. ,
Mauch , L. ,
Klingler , A.L.
et al.
2021 10.24406/publica-fhg-301145
3. Al-Wreikat , Y. ,
Serrano , C. , and
Sodré , J.R.
Effects of Ambient Temperature and Trip Characteristics on the Energy Consumption of an Electric Vehicle Energy 238 2022 122028 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122028
4. Steinstraeter , M. ,
Heinrich , T. , and
Lienkamp , M.
Effect of Low Temperature on Electric Vehicle Range World Electric Vehicle Journal 12 3 2021 115 10.3390/wevj12030115
5. Ma , S. ,
Jiang , M. ,
Tao , P. ,
Song , C.
et al.
Temperature Effect and Thermal Impact in Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 28 6 2018 653 666 10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.11.002