Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Synthetic fuels can significantly improve the combustion and emission characteristics of heavy-duty diesel engines toward decarbonizing heavy-duty propulsion systems. This work analyzes the effects of engine operating conditions and synthetic fuel properties on spray, combustion, and emissions (soot, NOx) using a supercharging single-cylinder engine experiment and KIVA-4 code combined with CHEMKIN-II and in-house phenomenological soot model. The blended fuel ratio is fixed at 80% diesel and 20% n-paraffin by volume (hereafter DP). Diesel, DP1 (diesel with n-pentane C5H12), DP2 (diesel with n-hexane C6H14), and DP3 (diesel with n-heptane C7H16) are used in engine-like-condition constant volume chamber (CVC) and engine experiments.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Boosted engine experiments (1080 rpm, common-rail injection pressure 160 MPa, multi-pulse injection) are performed using the same DP fuel groups under various main injection timings, pulse-injection intervals, and EGR = 0-40%. Once the 3D-CFD model is validated with the CVC and experimental engine data, in-cylinder combustion and emissions are analyzed. The CVC experiments show that DP2 and DP3 liquid penetrations are shorter than diesel oil. In engine tests, NOx did not change much for all DP fuels for the same engine operating condition. However, shorter-penetrated DP2 and DP3 reduce soot emissions by more than 60% and CO without worsening brake-specific fuel consumption compared to diesel oil. The 3D-CFD results show that n-hexane shifts the penetration of the high-carbon number to the low-carbon fuel. Vapor penetrations are found to be shortened by blending low-volatility fuels with diesel oil. Visualizations of the in-cylinder confirmed a decrease in the amount of soot formation near the wall for DP2 and DP3 fuels. In addition, equivalence ratio – temperature (phi-T) maps of these fuels indicate that at 40% EGR, soot emissions are reduced at lower equivalence ratios than diesel oil.</div></div>
Reference21 articles.
1. Joshi , A.
Review of Vehicle Engine Efficiency and Emissions SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 4 5 2022 1704 1733 https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0540
2. Yuan , H. ,
Takuma , T. ,
Yang , Y. ,
Shibata , G.
et al.
Effects of Chemical Compositions and Cetane Number of Fischer–Tropsch Fuels on Diesel Engine Performance Energies 15 11 4047 https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114047
3. Christopher , R. ,
Ebbesen , S.D. ,
Mogensen , M.B. , and
Lackner , K.S.
Sustainable Hydrocarbon Fuels by Recycling CO 2 and H 2 O with Renewable or Nuclear Energy Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 2011 1 23
4. Nakakita , K. ,
Ban , H. ,
Takasu , S. ,
Hotta , Y.
et al.
Effect of Hydrocarbon Molecular Structure in Diesel Fuel on In-Cylinder Soot Formation and Exhaust Emissions SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1914 2003 https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1914
5. Ogawa , H. ,
Sakane , Y. ,
Obe , T. ,
Arisawa , T.
et al.
Low Temperature Premixed Diesel Combustion with Blends of Ordinary Diesel Fuel and Normal Heptane SAE Int. J. Engines 9 1 2016 445 451