Affiliation:
1. Michigan Technological University, USA
2. Michigan Technological University, APS LABS, USA
3. Pettibone/Traverse Lift LLC, USA
Abstract
<div>The heavy-duty off-road industry continues to expand efforts to reduce fuel
consumption and CO<sub>2</sub>e (carbon dioxide equivalent) emissions. Many
manufacturers are pursuing electrification to decrease fuel consumption and
emissions. Future policies will likely require electrification for
CO<sub>2</sub>e savings, as seen in light-duty on-road vehicles. Electrified
architectures vary widely in the heavy-duty off-road space, with parallel
hybrids in some applications and series hybrids in others. The diverse
applications for different types of equipment mean different electrified
configurations are required. Companies must also determine the value in pursuing
electrified architectures; this work analyzes a range of electrified
architectures, from micro hybrids to parallel hybrids to series hybrids to a
BEV, looking at the total cost, total CO<sub>2</sub>e, and cost per
CO<sub>2</sub>e (cost of carbon abatement, or cost of carbon reduction)
using data for the year 2021. This study is focused on a heavy-duty off-road
material handler, the Pettibone Cary-Lift 204i. This machine’s specialty
application, including events like unloading large oil pipes from a railcar,
requires a unique electrified architecture that suits its specific needs.
However, the results from this study may be extrapolated to similar machinery to
inform fuel savings options across the heavy-duty off-road industry. In this
study, a unique electrified architecture is determined for the Cary-Lift. This
architecture is informed by multiple rounds of a Pugh matrix decision analysis
to select a shortened list of desirable electrified architectures. The shortened
list is modeled and simulated to determine CO<sub>2</sub>e, cost, and cost per
CO<sub>2</sub>e. A final architecture is determined as a plug-in series
hybrid that reduces fuel consumption by 65%, targeting the large fuel and
CO<sub>2</sub>e savings that are likely to be required for the future of the
heavy-duty off-road industry.</div>