Affiliation:
1. National Cereals Research Institute, Badeggi, Nigeria
2. Department of Agricultural and Bioenvironmental Engineering Federal Polytechnic, Bida, Nigeria
3. Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria
Abstract
Surface water plays an important role in carrying off different water wastes thereby affecting water quality used for different purposes. The Receptor Model (RM) development as a technique in the management of River water was used in this study, in identifying, separating and quantifying the major sources of water wastes flowing into River Musa, Bida, Nigeria. Twelve water variables were used in Principal Component Analysis. The generated variables of loaded components were used as independent variables and the Water Quality Index (WQI) as the dependent variable to estimate the quantity of identified pollutants sources using the Multiple Linear Regression Model (MLR). According to Canadian Council Ministers of Environments Water Quality Index (CCME WQI), the results determined for the five sample stations (Edokota location, Musa bridge location, Bida/Minna location, Ciriko location and Army Barrack location) were 74.4, 72.8, 64.6, 47.6, and 51.6 respectively. Among the five locations, three were investigated to be marginal and the remaining two were fair in rank. The principal component analysis (PCA) was adopted to separate the identified three major waste sources flowing into the river to be agricultural, municipal and industrial wastes. Pollutant levels were determined to be 0.936, 0.457 and 0.104 using RM at a high value of R2 (0.911). Agricultural waste was predicted to be the strongest pollutant contributor in the model, followed by municipal and the least contributor is industrial waste. It is strongly recommended that periodic monitoring and evaluation of the river water quality is carried out within the study area using the receptor model
Publisher
National Cereals Research Institute
Reference21 articles.
1. Ashock, L., Dough, H., and Tribeni, S. (2006). Application of CCME Water Quality Index to Monitor Water Quality: A case of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 113: 411-429.
2. Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1994) Water quality for agriculture: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29. Revision. 1. pp. 1-130.
3. CCME (2001). Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. CCME WATER QUALITY INDX 1.0. Technical Report.
4. Chapman, D. (1996). Water Quality assessments, a guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring 2nd edition, E and FN SPON, London.
5. Driver, N. and Tasker, G. (1990). Techniques for estimation of storm- runoff loads, volumes, and selected constituents concentration in urban watersheds in the United States. U.S. Geol.surv.water supply water.