Medication Adherence: does Patient Participation in Randomized Clinical Trials Affect on it?

Author:

Vasyukova N. O.1,Lukina Yu. V.1,Kutishenko N. P.1,Martsevich S. Yu.1,Zvonareva O. I.2

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine

2. Siberian State Medical University

Abstract

The article focuses on the problem of low adherence to treatment among patients, in general, and provides data on the high adherence among patients in randomized controlled trials. Low adherence remains one of the most debated and difficult problems to solve nowadays. Poor medication adherence of the patient can significantly worsen the effectiveness of treatment and leads to increased health care costs. And although the factors that improve adherence are varied, and include the skills of the doctor, the patient’s personal characteristics, the external environment, an individual approach to each patient and etc., the absence of a “gold standard” for assessing adherence in clinical practice makes it difficult to predict and significantly improve it among patients. Nevertheless, the article discusses the existing doctor-patient interaction model, which strictly regulates the algorithms and technical means to achieve the best medication adherence. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the basis of evidence-based medicine, the results obtained in RCT form the basis of existing clinical guidelines. While participating in RCT patients can receive comprehensive information about the disease, the effectiveness of drug therapy, possible side effects of the therapy being conducted, the research objectives and prognosis from their attending physician; patients are trained to be disciplined and adhere to the recommendations of the doctor. The RCT, for a number of objective reasons, uses a variety of methods for assessing adherence and ways to improve it, which leads to higher patient adherence then among patients in general.

Publisher

Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniyaizdat

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. Harris M., Taylor G., Jackson D. Clinical evidence made easy. Hockley, Essex: Scion Publishing Ltd.; 2014.

2. Ulmer C., Bruno M., Burke S., eds. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2010.

3. Martsevich S.Y., Kutishenko N.P. Randomised Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: the Ratio in the Hierarchy of Evidence of the Efficacy of Drugs. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2016;12(5):567-573 (In Russ.) DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2016-12-5-567-573.

4. Viswanathan M., Golin C.E., Jones C.D., et al. Interventions to Improve Adherence to Self-administered Medications for Chronic Diseases in the United States A Systematic Review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;157(11):785-795. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538.

5. MRC guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. London: MRC. 1998.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3