1. Amit, V., Anderson, S., Caputo, V., Postill, J., Reed-Danahay, D., & Vargas-Cetina, G. (2015). Thinking through sociality: The importance of mid-level concepts. In V. Amit (Eds.), Thinking through sociality and anthropological interrogation of key concepts (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
2. Becker, E., Jahn, T., & Stiess, I. (1999). Exploring uncommon ground: Sustainability and the social sciences. In E. Becker and T. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A Cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 1-22). London: Zed Books.
3. Burkart, J. M. (2017). Evolution and consequences of sociality. In J. Call, G. M. Burghardt, I. M. Pepperberg, C. T. Snowdon and T. Zentall (Eds.), APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behaviour (pp. 257–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000011-013
4. ERRCDF. (2019). Education Research and Rural Community Development Forum. https://www.errcd.com/author-guidelines
5. Jefferson, T., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Jama, 287(21), 2786-2790.