Dissociable Neural Mechanisms Underlie the Effects of Attention on Visual Appearance and Response Bias

Author:

Itthipuripat SirawajORCID,Phangwiwat Tanagrit,Wiwatphonthana Praewpiraya,Sawetsuttipan Prapasiri,Chang Kai-Yu,Störmer Viola S.,Woodman Geoffrey F.,Serences John T.ORCID

Abstract

A prominent theoretical framework spanning philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience holds that selective attention penetrates early stages of perceptual processing to alter the subjective visual experience of behaviorally relevant stimuli. For example, searching for a red apple at the grocery store might make the relevant color appear brighter and more saturated compared with seeing the exact same red apple while searching for a yellow banana. In contrast, recent proposals argue that data supporting attention-related changes in appearance reflect decision- and motor-level response biases without concurrent changes in perceptual experience. Here, we tested these accounts by evaluating attentional modulations of EEG responses recorded from male and female human subjects while they compared the perceived contrast of attended and unattended visual stimuli rendered at different levels of physical contrast. We found that attention enhanced the amplitude of the P1 component, an early evoked potential measured over visual cortex. A linking model based on signal detection theory suggests that response gain modulations of the P1 component track attention-induced changes in perceived contrast as measured with behavior. In contrast, attentional cues induced changes in the baseline amplitude of posterior alpha band oscillations (∼9-12 Hz), an effect that best accounts for cue-induced response biases, particularly when no stimuli are presented or when competing stimuli are similar and decisional uncertainty is high. The observation of dissociable neural markers that are linked to changes in subjective appearance and response bias supports a more unified theoretical account and demonstrates an approach to isolate subjective aspects of selective information processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTDoes attention alter visual appearance, or does it simply induce response bias? In the present study, we examined these competing accounts using EEG and linking models based on signal detection theory. We found that response gain modulations of the visually evoked P1 component best accounted for attention-induced changes in visual appearance. In contrast, cue-induced baseline shifts in alpha band activity better explained response biases. Together, these results suggest that attention concurrently impacts visual appearance and response bias, and that these processes can be experimentally isolated.

Funder

National Research Council of Thailand

Thailand Science Research and Innovation

Asahi Glass Foundation

Research and Innovation for Sustainability Center, Magnolia Quality Development Corporation Limited, Thailand

KMUTT Partnering initiative grant

the startup fund for junior researchers at King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

KMUTT’s Frontier Research Unit Grant for Neuroscience Center for Research and Innovation

HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute

Publisher

Society for Neuroscience

Subject

General Neuroscience

Reference159 articles.

1. American EEG Society (1980a) Minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. In: Guidelines in EEG-1980. Tucker, Georgia: American EEG Society.

2. American EEG Society (1980b) Minimum technical standards for EEG recording in suspected brain death. In: Guidelines in EEG-/980. Tucker, Georgia: American EEG Society.

3. American EEG Society (1980c) Minimal technical standards for pediatric electroencephalography. In: Guidelines in EEG-1980. Tucker, Georgia: American EEG Society.

4. American EEG Society (1980d) A proposal for standard montages to be used in clinical electroencephalography. In: Guidelines in EEG-1980. Tucker, Georgia: American EEG Society.

5. Bottom-Up Biases in Feature-Selective Attention

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. We know what attention is!;Trends in Cognitive Sciences;2023-12

2. Cultural contributions to cognitive aging;Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3