A Robust Comparison Powers of Four Multivariate Analysis of Variance Tests

Author:

Abstract

This paper compared the powers of four test statistics of Multivariate Analysis of Variance and test statistics include Lawley-Hotelling ,Pillai's trace, Roy’s largest root and Wilks' lambda. The R Statistics was employed to simulate the data used to compare the four test statistics under the Multivariate Gamma and Multivariate Normal distributions. The sample sizes utilized were 10, 20, 30, 40, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 700, 800 and 1000); Number of variables (p = 2, 3, and 4) equal and unequal samples and variance co-variance matrix were also used. The comparison were done at two levels of significance (α = 0.01 and 0.05) using power of the test. The results obtained indicated that the Roy’s largest Root test statistic is better than all other test statistic considered when p = g = 2 because it has the least powers. The result of the analysis further showed that when p = g = 3 and p = g = 4 the Wilks' lambda proved better than all other test statistics both for small and large sample sizes. The results equally showed that when the data are multivariate normal and Gamma with g =2 and p = 2 the power of the four test statistics from best to least is Roy’s largest root, followed Lawley’s trace = Pillae’s trace and the least is Wilks’ Lambda at significant levels of 0.01 and 0.05 for equal and unequal samples. More so, when data are multivariate normal as well as gamma and p= g = 3 and p=g=4, the power of the four statistics ranked from best to least is Wilks’ Lambda , Pillae’s trace = Lawley’s trace and Roy’s largest root respectively . From the findings, it is evidently obvious that Roy’s largest root should be applied when p=g=2 while Wilks’ Lambda be used when p=g=3 and p=g=4. This study will help researchers to plan studies with controlled probabilities of detecting a meaningful effect thereby giving conclusive results with maximum efficiency.

Publisher

European Centre for Research Training and Development

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3