Affiliation:
1. Universidad de La Frontera
Abstract
The present study aimed at determining the association between life satisfaction and subjective happiness while controlling for social desirability, and to explore whether overall satisfaction with life can be predicted by satisfaction with life dimensions while controlling for social desirability. The study had a quantitative, non-experimental cross-sectional design, with 279 participants from different universities of the Council of Rectors of Chile recruited through a non-probabilistic sampling method for convenience. The participants completed an online questionnaire that inquired about their global and dimensional satisfaction with life, subjective happiness, social desirability, and sociodemographic variables. The data was analysed using partial correlations and multiple regression analyses. Bivariate correlation results indicate weak and direct associations between social desirability and life satisfaction and subjective happiness, and a strong and direct association between the latter. According to the results of the partial correlation analysis, the association between life satisfaction and subjective happiness is maintained even when social convenience is controlled. The results of the multiple regression analyses indicate that although social desirability predicts life satisfaction by itself, when satisfaction with life dimensions is added to the model, social desirability loses its predictive power. In conclusion, although social desirability is associated with the two components, affective and cognitive, of subjective well-being, this association loses predictive power when other variables are considered in predictive models.
Publisher
Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicologia Matematic
Reference37 articles.
1. Adimark. (2000). El nivel socioeconómico ESOMAR. Manual de aplicación. Santiago: Adimark.
2. Caputo, A. (2017). Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: evidence from an online survey. Universitas Psychologica, 16(2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-2.sdsw
3. Diener, E. (1994). El bienestar subjetivo. Psychosocial Intervention, .(8), 67-113. Retrieved from http://www.psychosocial-intervention.org/&numero=51994381
4. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
5. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献