Affiliation:
1. Complutense University of Madrid
Abstract
This paper sets forth a quantitative analysis of expressions of epistemicity, a category covering the expression of commitment to the information transmitted, in a corpus of 25 threads extracted from British discussion forums. Epistemicity is divided into three categories: epistemic modality, evidentiality and factivity, each divided into subcategories. The results are analysed in contrast to comparable corpora of newspaper opinion articles and political speeches. The analysis uncovers significant differences in the expression of epistemicity in the three genres, in terms of both frequency and distribution across categories, the subcategory ‘cognitive attitude’ being a case in point. Epistemicity in the discussion forums is also proved to display features of orality and routinisation.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference39 articles.
1. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 2002. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London & New York: Longman.
2. Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functionalcognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter.
3. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Carretero, Marta. 1995. La pragmática de las expresiones de modalidad epistémica en el inglés hablado. PhD diss, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/3368/1/AH3009201.pdf.
5. Carretero, Marta. 2014. “The Role of Authorial Voice in Professional and Nonprofessional Reviews of Films: An English-Spanish Contrastive Study of Engagement.” Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Ed. Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 55–85.