Abstract
The article deals with the discourse about the application of the Hungarian capital Budapest for the 2024 Summer Olympics. Due to the country’s long sporting traditions and its many Olympic suc- cesses, Hungary has long had the idea that the country deserves the opportunity to host the Olympic games. This idea received eminent support from the conservative government of Viktor Orbán, thus Hungary’s Olympic bid practically began its preparation in 2015. Opposing this idea, a counter- movement has been formed, which suggested that Hungary’s nancial resources and current social support were not strong enough for an application. The confrontation of positions quickly led to a change in the discourse that resulted the withdrawal of the application. The article focuses on the course of this debate and its linguistic analysis.
Reference40 articles.
1. Bachmann-Medick, Doris (1996): Einleitung. In: Doris Bachmann-Medick (Hrsg.): Kultur als Text. Die anthropologische Wende in der Literaturwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main, S. 7–64.
2. Baumgartner, Frank/ Jones, Bryan (2009): Agendas and instability in American politics, 2. Auflage, Chicago.
3. Baumgartner, Frank/ Jones, Bryan/ Wilkerson, John (2011): Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. In: Comparative Political Studies, 44/8, S. 947–972.
4. Becker, Maria (2015): Der Asyldiskurs in Deutschland. Eine medienlinguistische Untersuchung von Pressetexten, Onlineforen und Polit-Talkshows. Frankfurt am Main.
5. Bubenhofer, Noah (2008): Diskurse berechnen? Wege zu einer korpuslinguistischen Diskursanalyse. In: Warnke, Ingo H./ Spitzmüller, Jürgen (Hrsg.): Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene. Berlin, S. 407–434.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献