Affiliation:
1. İSTANBUL KÜLTÜR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
2. MALTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
3. İSTANBUL RUMELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
The purpose of this current study is to develop the Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, which measures the regulation of emotions, cognitions, behaviors and interpersonal relationships in order to reach the eudaimonia explained by ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, Flourishing Scale, Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale, Personal Growth Initiative Scale, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale were used as measurement instruments. Participants of the study consisted of 1042 adults between the ages of 18 and 65, including 3 different sample groups. As a result of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) of Eudaimonic Self Regulation Scale, a 10-factor structure model with 43 items, which explained % 57.93 of the total variance was obtained. According to the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results, the factor loadings ranged from .48 to .88. In addition, model fit indices were satisfactory (χ2=2395.39; df=815, χ2/df=2.93, RMSEA=0.054, CFI=0.97, IFI=0.97, SRMR=0.050). Cronbach’s α values of sub-scales ranged from .75 to .89. In terms of convergent validity, eudaimonic self-regulation indicated significant correlations with psychological well-being, mindfulness, self-efficacy, and personal growth initiative. According to the results of test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .82 to .94, Pearson's correlation coefficients were between .71 and .88. These results indicated that this scale was a valid and reliable instrument to assess eudaimonic self-regulation in the relevant researches.
Publisher
Dokuz Eylil University Graduate School of Social Sciences
Reference63 articles.
1. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49 (2), 155-173.
2. Akın A. & Anlı G. (2011). Bireysel gelişim inisiyatifi ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 42-49.
3. Akın, A., Demirci, İ., Çardak, M., Işık, Y. & Yıldız, E. (2012). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cognitive and Affective Regulation Scale. Paper presented at the International Interdisciplinary Social Inquiry Conference- IISIC, Haziran, 17-21, Bursa, Turkey.
4. Aristoteles (2014). Nikomakhos’a etik. F. Akderin (çev.), İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
5. Aristoteles (2015). Eudemos’a etik. S. Babür (çev.), Ankara: Bilge Su Yayıncılık.