Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of the international legal policy of state, which has been conceptually developed in the French legal doctrine. According to the classical concept of the present phenomenon, each state seeks to contribute to the content of international legal norms by participating in the coordination of wills of states in different ways. To promote and assert its position on existing and nascent international legal norms, the state constructs a policy, which guides its international legal practice. However, the conduct of an individual international legal policy raises questions, including critical ones. Interpretation of the role of international legal policy as a simple legal justification for politically motivated decisions leads to the "instrumental" concept of international legal policy. However, in the classical concept, the consideration of international law as an instrument of the state's foreign policy is not acceptable and, moreover, contradicts the very objective of international legal policy – legitimation. The achievement of this purpose is subject to the principle of the rule of international law in international relations. In its turn the instrumental understanding of the international legal policy allows for departures from the existing international law and thereby contributes to international legal destabilization. In this context, the article shows that being flexible the international law develops with the changing interests of states on the international arena on the background of various interstate relations, while the international law’s flexibility is considered as an essential prerequisite for its development. and tasks of states in the international arena. During the development of new norms of international law, the conduct by the state of a competent, active international legal policy, even if its partners do not agree with it, does not per se prejudice the foundations of international law. On the contrary, the policy aimed at its adjustment is a conditio sine qua non for the maintenance of international legal order, its evolutionary adaptation to changing international relations, other challenges of our time. Thuswise the concept of international legal policy allows us to reconsider the competition of multi-vector international legal «manoeuvers" of states.
Publisher
Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations
Subject
History,Cultural Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Political Science and International Relations,Law
Reference48 articles.
1. Aalberts T., Gammeltoft-Hansen T. (2018). Sovereignty Games, International Law and Politics. In T. Aalberts & T. Gammeltoft-Hansen (eds.), The Changing Practices of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 251 p. P. 26–44.
2. Beard C. A., Smith G. H. E., Vagts A., Beard W. (1966). The Idea of National Interest: an Analytical Study in American Foreign Policy. Chicago: Quadrangle Books. xxv. 475 p.
3. Bodin J. (1579). Les six livres de la République. de l'impr. de Jean de Tournes. Lyon. 762 p.
4. Botero G. (2017). The Reason of State. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. (1589). Ed. by R. Bireley. 70 p.
5. Brownlie J. (2008). Principles of Public International Law. 7th ed. Oxford: OUP. 784 p.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献