Parsing China’s geostrategic designs in the post-war Afghanistan

Author:

Yao-Tian Fan1,Li Wang2

Affiliation:

1. Renmin University

2. SIPA, Jilin University

Abstract

China boasts prolonged history of relations with Afghanistan. Throughout the 2010s, China has seen Afghanistan as a key part of what can be described the dynamically transnational “Belt-Road-Initiative”. Now with the Taliban takeover of the country, the question arises how China would be able to play a premier role in the post-war Afghanistan while trying to shun itself to be embroiled into the geopolitical mire as the superpowers did in history? The current study addresses two questions through an analytical-empirical approach to how China will realize its geostrategic design in Afghanistan. First, what are China’s objectives which are supposed to differ from those of the USSR and the USA? Second, why would China likely succeed in the country where the superpowers had failed before? Over the past decades, China has geared up its strategic ties with Russia, Pakistan, Iran, known as the Eurasian partners on the Afghan issue, and Central Asian states which are either the neighbors of Afghanistan or the member states of the SCO. Since Beijing endorses multilateralism and inclusive partnership in foreign affairs, it will unlikely act alone on the issue of Afghanistan. Rather, China is supposed to work on it through triple-level platforms–the Eurasian partners, SCO member states with border proximity of Afghanistan and the multilateral organizations such as the U.N. and the G-20–to fulfill its geostrategic designs in Afghanistan.

Publisher

Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations

Subject

History,Cultural Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Political Science and International Relations,Law

Reference10 articles.

1. Bender P. (2003). Weltmacht Amerika. Das Neue Rom. Stuttgart: J. G. Cottasche Buchhandlung Nachfolger GmbH. 295 p.

2. Hirono M. (2019). China’s Conflict Mediation & Durability of the Principle of Non-Interference: The Case of Post-2014 Afghanistan. The China Quarterly. Vol. 239. P. 614–634.

3. Kissinger H. (1994). Diplomacy. NY: Simon & Schuster. 813 p.

4. Kissinger H. (2014). World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. NY: Allen Lane. 432 p.

5. Morgenthau H.J.,Thompson K. (1985). Politics among Nations – the struggle for power and peace, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3