US Congress and Policy of Sanctions

Author:

Timofeev I.1

Affiliation:

1. MGIMO University

Abstract

U.S. Congress plays an increasing role in the American policy of economic sanctions. Although the President and the Administration retain a significant power in national foreign policy, including the use of sanctions, Congress affects political agenda, promotes its own design of sanctions and keeps an eye on their implementation and further upgrade. Emergence of sanctions in the pubic laws, initiated and passed by Congress, usually makes their revocation hardly possible and keeps them for a long term. Such an institutional role of Congress raises a number of research questions. What are the key target priorities for Congress in terms of sanctions policy? Do these priorities overlap with the ones of the Administration? Are there any partisan splits on sanctions or sanctions policy is rather a matter of bipartisan consensus? What instruments of sanctions does Congress prefer? What share of bills finally turns into public laws and what is a connection of bills success to partisan affiliation or priorities concerned? To deal with these questions, the article reflects an analysis of 539 Congressional bills on sanctions, introduced in the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2019-2023. The database of bills includes such variables as targets of sanctions, political triggers of proposed restrictions, list of measures proposed, partisan affiliation of sponsors and cosponsors, etc. Results demonstrate the overlapping of priorities of Congress and Administration, though Congress attempts to constrain Administration on a number of issues, such as Iranian Nuclear Deal. There are specific partisan priorities. Republicans are proactive on sanctioning China, Iran and Afghanistan. Democrats are exploring new areas of sanctions use, such as climate, ecology, minorities’ rights, etc. Still, most of the bills have a bipartisan composition of sponsors and cosponsors. Most of successful bills, which turned into laws, are of bipartisan nature. Congressional bills imply the use of universal instruments of targeted sanctions such as asset blocking, visa bans or trade restrictions. However, country-specific measures, like suspension of particular military cooperation programs, are also on the radars of Congress. China and Russia a key priorities for Congress in terms of sanctions.

Publisher

Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations

Subject

History,Cultural Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Political Science and International Relations,Law

Reference28 articles.

1. Belonogov A. (1974). Belyj dom i Kapitolij – partner i soperniki. Prinyatie SSHA mezhdunarodnykh obyazatelstv [White House and Capitol Hill – Partners and Competitors. International Obligations’ Adoption Process in the US]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 197 p.

2. Chafetz J. (2012). Congress’s Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 160. P. 715–778.

3. Cooper Z., Lorber E. (2016). Sanctioning the Dragon. The National Interest. No. 2. P. 36–42.

4. Gromyko A. (1957). Kongress SSHA. Vybory, organizatsiya, polnomochiya [US Congress. Elections, Structure, Powers]. Moscow: IMO. 190 p.

5. Hanauer L. (2015). The Days after a Deal with Iran. Congress’s Role in Implementing a Nuclear Agreement. Rand Corporation. 38 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3