What Drives the West in Its Energy Policy?

Author:

Borovsky Yu.1

Affiliation:

1. MGIMO University

Abstract

In 2022, the countries united by the concept of “the West” imposed unprecedented energy sanctions on Russia, thereby reacting to Moscow's special military operation in Ukraine launched in February. This article presents a comprehensive study aimed at identifying the essential motives of the “collective West’s” energy policy. The first part of the paper gives an utilitarian vision of the problem in question. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the U.S. shale revolution and the development of renewable energy sources, Western states, taken together, continue to depend heavily on oil and gas imports and, therefore, they are mostly driven in their energy policy by the need to neutralize the critical importance of hydrocarbons with a view to avoiding political and economic ramifications. The paper, in its second part, considers the Western energy policy at the tactical level where it can be either defensive or offensive as well as at the strategic level where the united West seeks mostly to effect energy transition. The article demonstrates that, from the perspective of international relations theory, the West’s energy policy in its tactical and strategic dimensions fits most into the realist concept. Basic liberal imperatives define it as a relatively feeble one whereas constructivism is not able to identify its objective patterns. Additional theoretical footholds in understanding the West’s motives in the field of energy supply are provided by the concepts of liberal interventionism and neoconservatism as well as by neo­Marxism. The latter sees the energy policy of the West through the prism of the struggle of states forming the "center", "periphery" and "semi­periphery" of the world.

Publisher

Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations

Subject

History,Cultural Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Political Science and International Relations,Law

Reference59 articles.

1. Amin S. (2014) Capitalism in the age of globalization: the management of contemporary society. London, New York: Zed books. 158 p.

2. Amin S. (1997) Die Zukunft des Weltsystems [The Future of the World System]. Hamburg: VSA. 152 p.

3. Amin S. (1977) Imperialism and Unequal Development. NY: Monthly Review Press. 267 p.

4. Borisov M. G. (2020). Energeticheski Perekhod i Geopolitika [Energy Transition and Geopolitics]. Vostochnaya analytica. No.1. P. 7–16.

5. Borovsky Yu.V. (2008) Politizatsiya Mirovoi Energetiki [Politicization of Global Energy]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 6. No. 1 (16). P. 19–28.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3