Abstract
In 2022, the countries united by the concept of “the West” imposed unprecedented energy sanctions on Russia, thereby reacting to Moscow's special military operation in Ukraine launched in February. This article presents a comprehensive study aimed at identifying the essential motives of the “collective West’s” energy policy. The first part of the paper gives an utilitarian vision of the problem in question. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the U.S. shale revolution and the development of renewable energy sources, Western states, taken together, continue to depend heavily on oil and gas imports and, therefore, they are mostly driven in their energy policy by the need to neutralize the critical importance of hydrocarbons with a view to avoiding political and economic ramifications. The paper, in its second part, considers the Western energy policy at the tactical level where it can be either defensive or offensive as well as at the strategic level where the united West seeks mostly to effect energy transition. The article demonstrates that, from the perspective of international relations theory, the West’s energy policy in its tactical and strategic dimensions fits most into the realist concept. Basic liberal imperatives define it as a relatively feeble one whereas constructivism is not able to identify its objective patterns. Additional theoretical footholds in understanding the West’s motives in the field of energy supply are provided by the concepts of liberal interventionism and neoconservatism as well as by neoMarxism. The latter sees the energy policy of the West through the prism of the struggle of states forming the "center", "periphery" and "semiperiphery" of the world.
Publisher
Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations
Subject
History,Cultural Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Political Science and International Relations,Law
Reference59 articles.
1. Amin S. (2014) Capitalism in the age of globalization: the management of contemporary society. London, New York: Zed books. 158 p.
2. Amin S. (1997) Die Zukunft des Weltsystems [The Future of the World System]. Hamburg: VSA. 152 p.
3. Amin S. (1977) Imperialism and Unequal Development. NY: Monthly Review Press. 267 p.
4. Borisov M. G. (2020). Energeticheski Perekhod i Geopolitika [Energy Transition and Geopolitics]. Vostochnaya analytica. No.1. P. 7–16.
5. Borovsky Yu.V. (2008) Politizatsiya Mirovoi Energetiki [Politicization of Global Energy]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 6. No. 1 (16). P. 19–28.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献