Abstract
Eurasian Black Vulture (EBV) and Eurasian Griffon Vulture (EGV), while residents elsewhere, winter in Uttar Pradesh, India. Knowledge of the habitat and regulating factors is obligatory for protection and better management of these vultures. Therefore, different types of habitats were mapped using eight species distribution models. Presence records from field survey, published data and citizen science, and 23 bioenvironmental raster layers were the model inputs. Eighteen models were developed whose strength varied greatly. As per the performance indicators, GBM and GLM were found to be superior models for EGV. For EBV all models were acceptable. MARS, with good model strength, was rejected on the grounds of field verification. However, the Ensemble model, overall, was found the best. As per this model, good habitat was restricted mostly in the Tarai ecozone. The top two vital variables were NDVI, and bio13 for both the vultures. The most vital temperature variable for EGV was bio08 while bio09 for EBV. Tarai ecozone showed the largest expanse of suitable area for both the vultures followed by Vindhyan-Bundelkhand, Gangetic plains and Semi-arid ecozones. Among the two, EBV (49000 km2) had more suitable area than EGV (37000 km2). Agricultural areas were found to be largely unsuitable. As per land cover, good habitat was mostly confined in forests. For better management of these wintering vultures which need only roosting and foraging, it is proposed that destruction of forested habitat and decrease in foraging materials needed immediate attention and control.
Publisher
Society of Land Measurements and Cadastre from Transylvania
Reference82 articles.
1. Abolmaali M-RS, Tarkesh M, Bashari H (2018). MaxEnt modeling for predicting suitable habitats and identifying the effects of climate change on a threatened species, Daphne mucronata in central Iran. Ecological Informatics 43:116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.002
2. Aguilar GD, Waqa-Sakiti H, Winder L (2016). Using predicted locations and an ensemble approach to address sparse data sets for species distribution modelling: Long-horned beetles (Cerambycidae) of the Fiji Islands. Unitec ePress. Retrieved from http://www.unitec.ac.nz/epress/
3. Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006). Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43:1223-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
4. Anderson MG, Rhymer JM, Rohwer F (1992). Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (Eds). Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. MN: University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis pp 365-395.
5. Anoop NR, Babu S, Nagarajan R, Sen S (2020). Identifying suitable reintroduction sites for the White-rumped Vulture (Gyps bengalensis) in India’s Western Ghats using niche models and habitat requirements. Ecological Engineering 158:106034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoleng. 2020.106034
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献