Abstract
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate three harvest strategies of corn intercropped with pigeon pea + Palisade grass on weight gain since grazing through finishing. A triple intercropping of corn + pigeon pea + Palisade grass was established in nine hectares (ha) during the 2016/17 season. Treatments were determined according to each corn harvest strategy: whole crop silage (WCS), high moisture corn (HMC) or corn grain (CG). The latter was not harvested due to a low yield and difficulties to hire a combine harvester for only three ha. After harvest, the 9-ha area was divided in six 1.5-ha pens for the grazing phase of the experiment with 30 non-castrated Nelore steers. The same animals were fed feedlot diets based on three sources of corn following the same harvest strategy (treatments): WCS, HMC or CG (bought from a feed industry). During the grazing phase the area that was supposed to be harvested for CG resulted in the greatest (p≤0.05) stocking rate (3.02 LU/ha) and weight gain per area (210 kg of BW/ha) compared with WCS and HMC. There was no response (p≥0.05) of corn source (according to each harvest strategy) on feed conversion ratio (FCR), body weith (BW) growth, subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), pre-slaughter BW, hot carcass weight (HCW) and dressing percentage (DP) during the finishing phase. The data reported here may be a valuable guideline for decision making according to the beef production system and economic scenario.
Reference30 articles.
1. Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. ABIEC. Beef report. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil; 2021. http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/
2. Braga GB, Ferreira Neto JS, Ferreira F, Amaku M, Dias RA. Caracterização dos sistemas de criação de bovinos com atividade reprodutiva na região Centro-Sul do Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 2015; 52(3):217-227. http://10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v52i3p217-227
3. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010; 327(5967):812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
4. Dias-Filho MB. Os desafios da produção animal em pastagens na fronteira agrícola brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011; 40 (special supplement):270-279. http://www.sbz.org.br/revista/artigos/66282.pdf
5. Alary V, Corbeels M, Affholder F, Alvarez S, Soria A, Valadares Xavier JH, Silva FAM, Scopel E. Economic assessment of conservation agriculture options in mixed crop-livestock systems in Brazil using farm modelling. Agricultural Systems. 2016; 144:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.008