Abstract
This study aims to investigate board diversity using bibliometric analysis. This study examines publication sources, authorship, citations, distribution of publications, and other bibliometric indicators. This study focuses on 290 articles published from 2013 to 2022. Using an automated process, these articles were extracted from the Scopus database and analyzed using bibliometric indicator analysis, VOSviewer, Microsoft Excel, OpenRefine and Perish or Publish. A total of 290 research articles and reviews on board diversity were included in this study. The present study found that the United States was the most productive country (n = 61), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 42), Australia (n = 29), and China (n = 27). The Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France (n = 8) was the most prominent institution. This study unveils relevant articles, authors, and journals that have discussed board diversity. This study's findings can inform practitioners of the state of the art and the particulars of the most prolific studies. In addition, this study aims to clarify the project themes and tools utilized most frequently in these works. The locations of influential articles and their authors are disclosed. In addition, a list of often-used terms aids in developing a research agenda that highlights pertinent themes, methods, and industries.
Publisher
AMH International Conferences and Seminars Organizing LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Ahmi, A. & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Literature on Web Accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 77(6S2), 250–258.
2. Al-Qahtani, M. & Elgharbawy, A. (2020). The effect of board diversity on disclosure and management of greenhouse gas information: evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1557–1579.
3. Ali, F., Wang, M., Jebran, K. & Ali, S. T. (2020). Board diversity and firm efficiency: evidence from China. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(4), 587–607.
4. Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A. & Zhao, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5–38.
5. Anuar, A., Marwan, N. F., Smith, J., Siriyanun, S. & Sharif, A. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of immigration and environmental degradation: evidence from past decades. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 13729–13741.