Going beyond the 20th century color space to evaluate LED color consistency

Author:

Fryc I.1ORCID,Listowski M.1ORCID,Supronowicz R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering

Abstract

The color matching possibilities between (reference) phosphor-converted LEDs (pc-LEDs) and replacement metameric LEDs made by color mixing technology (cm-LEDs) were evaluated in the classical 20th century CIE 1976 color space developed for perpendicular viewing (based on a 2° colorimetric observer) and in the latest CIE 2015 cone fundamental color space developed for wide field of view observers (10° colorimetric observer). For each given pc-LED 10 different sets of cm-LEDs were designed and evaluated for color consistency in 2°and 10° color spaces. There were 10 different B-color LEDs considered along with constant RGA LEDs. There are thousands of possible distributions that are metameric in the CIE 1976 color space and thousands of possible distributions that are metameric in the CIE 2015 color space for each set of LEDs. From the population of SPDs, we selected 10 metameric SPDs characterized by maximum differences between chromaticities. The results provide evidence that evaluating LED color consistency based only on the CIE 1976 color space is not fully informative because it may provide inaccurate information about light color consistency when the observer has a wide field of view. There are cases showed in this paper where cm-LEDs are color consistent in the CIE 2015 color space but are not color consistent in the CIE 1976 color space and vice versa. Including color consistency in the new CIE 2015 color space should be treated as an additional evaluation tool proving the user additional information relevant to the intended use of the LED. The results illustrate differences in LED color consistency evaluated in different color spaces and provides incentive go beyond the 20th century color space in the evaluation of cm-LED color consistency.

Funder

Politechnika Bialostocka

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group

Subject

Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3