Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies
Author:
Aczel BalazsORCID, Szaszi Barnabas, Nilsonne Gustav, Van den Akker OlmoORCID, Albers Casper JORCID, van Assen Marcel A. L. M.ORCID, Bastiaansen Jojanneke A.ORCID, Benjamin Daniel Jacob, Boehm Udo, Botvinik-Nezer Rotem, Bringmann Laura FrancinaORCID, Busch Niko, Caruyer EmmanuelORCID, Cataldo Andrea Michael, Cowan Nelson, Delios Andrew, van Dongen Noah N'Djaye Nikolai, Donkin Chris, van Doorn Johnny, Dreber Anna, Dutilh Gilles, Egan Gary F., Gernsbacher Morton Ann, Hoekstra RinkORCID, Hoffmann SabineORCID, Holzmeister FelixORCID, Johannesson Magnus, Jonas Kai, Kindel Alexander, Kirchler Michael, Kunkels Yoram Kevin, Lindsay D. Stephen, Mangin Jan-Francois, Matzke Dora, Munafo Marcus RobertORCID, Newell Ben R, Nosek Brian A.ORCID, Poldrack Russell, van Ravenzwaaij DonORCID, Rieskamp Jörg, Salganik Matthew, Sarafoglou AlexandraORCID, Schonberg Tom, Schweinsberg Martin, Shanks David, Silberzahn Raphael, Simons Daniel J.ORCID, Spellman Bobbie, Starns Jeffrey JosephORCID, St-Jean SamuelORCID, Uhlmann Eric Luis, Wicherts Jelte M.ORCID, Wagenmakers Eric-JanORCID
Abstract
We present consensus-based guidance for conducting and documenting multi-analyst studies. We discuss why broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach will strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions in empirical sciences.
Publisher
Center for Open Science
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|