Comparative characteristics of disinfectants for dairy equipment and quality of dairy products under the influence of paratypical environmental factors
-
Published:2023-05-25
Issue:1(178)
Volume:
Page:159-167
-
ISSN:2415-7635
-
Container-title:Tehnologìâ virobnictva ì pererobki produktìv tvarinnictva
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Tehnologìâ virobnictva ì pererobki produktìv tvarinnictva
Author:
Gryshko V.1ORCID, Andriychuk A.1ORCID, Zotsenko V.1ORCID, Ostrovskiy D.1ORCID, Bondarenko L.1ORCID, Balatsky Y.1ORCID, Malyna V.1ORCID, Fedorchenko M.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine
Abstract
The parameters of the microclimate of the barn under the untethered method of keeping cows in the spring were studied. It was found that the temperature in the barn was on average 8.8±1.34 °C, the relative humidity and air velocity in the compared rooms were within the limits of hygienic standards. Microbiological indicators of bacterial air contamination correspond to the upper limits of hygienic standards and amounted to 116.64±6.32 CFU/sс3. The bacterial contamination of technological equipment averaged 119.33±14.71 thousand CFU/sc3. The content of harmful gases in the premises did not exceed the permissible sanitary and hygienic standards and was within the limits of the standards of VNTP-APC-01.05 Livestock enterprises (complexes, farms, small farms). The average number of MAFANM in the flushes from the study objects (teat rubber, collector, milk hose, milk pipeline) after washing with water was 368.4±9.8 thousand CFU/ sс3, and with 0.5% soda ash solution - 249.0±11.7 thousand CFU/sс3. The best level of microbiological cleanliness of the internal surfaces of dairy equipment was provided by sanitization using the disinfectant "Perfo Grif", with the number of MAFANM in the flushes averaging 139.7±7.0 thousand CFU/sс3. The best indicators of microbiological cleanliness of dairy equipment were obtained during sanitization with 0.5% Higienic-K solution. The average number of MAFANM was 126.2±1.5 thousand CFU/sс3. When using a solution of soda ash for sanitizing dairy equipment, the amount of MAFANM in freshly milked milk taken from the cooler was 198.3±12.16 thousand CFU/ sс3, which corresponds to the first grade according to DSTU 3362:2018 "Cow's milk". Technical conditions. At the same time, during the sanitization of equipment with acidic detergents and disinfectants "Perfo Grif" and "Higienic-K", the amount of MAFANM in milk was 114±8.14 and 102.0±16.3 thousand CFU/sс3, respectively, which corresponds to the highest grade. At the same time, the BCCP titer was more than 1.0, and the number of somatic cells (SCC) was within the permissible range (400 thousand/ml). Therefore, for effective sanitary and hygienic treatment of milking equipment, working solutions of disinfectants based on peracetic, nitric and phosphoric acids should contain 0.5% of the active ingredient, which will ensure the destruction of microorganisms during exposure for 5 – 15 minutes.
Key words: dairy equipment, dairy products, disinfection, milk production hygiene, microbiological indicators of milk, milk production technology, milk quality.
Publisher
The Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference21 articles.
1. Akhlaghi, M., Dorost, A., Karimyan, K., Narooie, M.R., Sharafi, H. (2018). Data for comparison of chlorine dioxide and chlorine disinfection power in a real dairy wastewater effluent. Data Brief. 18, pp. 886–890. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.117. PMID: 29900255; PMCID: PMC5996494. 2. DSTU 3662:2018 (2018). Moloko-syrovyna korovyache. Tekhnichni umovy. [Chynnyy vid 2019- 01-01]. Kyyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrayiny [DSTU 3662:2018 (2018). Cow's raw milk. Specifications. [Effective from 2019-01-01]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhivstandard of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian). 3. Elmoslemany, A. M., Keefe, G. P., Dohoo, I. R., Wichtel, J. J., Stryhn, H., Dingwell, R.T. (2010). The association between bulk tank milk analysis for raw milk quality and on-farm management practices. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 95(1–2), 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.03.007. 4. Kasyanchuk, V., Kryzhanivsʹkyy, YA. Y., Danylenko, I. A. (2006). Retelʹnyy kontrolʹ vyrobnytstva moloka na fermi – osnovnyy vazhilʹ u zabezpechenni naselennya vysokoyakisnoyu produktsiyeyu [Careful control of milk production on the farm is the main lever in providing the population with high-quality products]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrayiny [Animal husbandry of Ukraine], 4, pp. 20–22. (in Ukrainian). 5. Kukhtyn, M. D., Perkiy, YU. B., Pokotylo, O. S. (2015). Efektyvna sanitarna obrobka tekhnolohichnoho obladnannya yak osnova bezpechnoho vyrobnytstva [Effective sanitary treatment of technological equipment as the basis of safe production]. Molochna industriya [Dairy industry], 4, pp. 26–27. (in Ukrainian).
|
|