Modifed Delphi analysis of the guidelines of the All-Russian public organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists” “The use of non-invasive lung ventilation”

Author:

Dunts Pavel V.1ORCID,Andreenko A. A.2ORCID,Bautin A. E.3ORCID,Grigoryev S. V.4ORCID,Doroginin S. V.5ORCID,Zamyatin M. N.6ORCID,Kuzovlev A. N.7ORCID,Lazarev V. V.8ORCID,Leyderman I. N.3ORCID,Lomivorotov V. V.9ORCID,Potievskaya V. I.10ORCID,Subbotin V. V.11ORCID,Trembach N. V.12ORCID,Fisher V. V.13ORCID,Shifman E. M.14ORCID,Shchegolev A. V.2ORCID,Zabolotskikh I. B.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pacific State Medical University, Vladivostok, Russia; Regional Clinical Hospital No 2, Vladivostok, Russia

2. Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia

3. Almazov National Medical Research Center, St. Petersburg, Russia

4. Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia

5. Clinical Hospital No 1, Smolensk, Russia

6. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow, Russia

7. Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia

8. Pirogov Russia National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

9. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

10. National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russia

11. Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia; Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

12. Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia; Regional Clinical Hospital No 2, Krasnodar, Russia

13. Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia

14. Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia

15. Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia; Regional Clinical Hospital No 2, Krasnodar, Russia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The need for an independent assessment of the guidelines before their planned revision based on the third-party opinion of competent specialists is beyond doubt. This analysis allows to adapt the implementation of recommendations in practice, regarding equipment and knowledge of physicians. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness, safety and availability of implementation in clinical practice of the guidelines “Application of non-invasive lung ventilation” using the modified Delphi method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expertise consisted of three stages. The first stage consisted in the analysis of the guidelines “The use of non-invasive lung ventilation” and the preparation of a questionnaire. At the main stage, a questionnaire was sent out and panel members were asked to evaluate the positions using ten-point Likert scale. The analytical stage consisted in calculating the weighted average, median and mode. The weighted average score were taken into account; the value of the median or mode of criteria for the quality of medical care, weighted average. RESULTS: Fifteen panel members was enrolled. The main remarks and additions were to clarify the terminology, concretize certain recommendations and style. Panel members determined the possibility of implementing the recommendation of the guidelines in practice. The lack of equipment makes therapeutic measures limited. This fact confirms the low results of the weighted average assessment of the criteria for the quality of medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on 20 of the 21 thesis recommendations, on four of the eight criteria for the quality of medical care, and on the amended wording of certain recommendations. The Delphi analysis made it possible to look at the implementation of the giudelines from the perspective of practicing anesthesiologist and intensive care physician, including in structural units with a low level of material and equipment.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Subject

Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medical Services

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3