Intellectual ventilation modes in Russian Federation: a short questionnaire survey

Author:

Komnov R. D.1ORCID,Eremenko Aleksandr A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

2. Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are a lot of clinical trials about benefits of closed-loop ventilation modes, which are able to automatically adjust certain respiratory settings. These studies describe safety, reliability and advantages of intellectual modes over conventional ventilation modes. OBJECTIVE: To assess awareness of Russian intensive care practitioners about closed loop ventilation modes and availability of these modes in routine practice. The second aim was to explore difficulties and problems that arise for practitioners during work with these modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A short survey conducted with online and offline questionnaire. The survey consisted of nine questions regarding the application of closed-loop modes, some question has open answers. RESULTS: The response rate of the survey was 33 % (248 of 750). Most of respondents (85 %) have heard about closed-loop modes, and 52 % had access to these technologies in routine practice. But only 23 % of respondents use Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and analogues as primary mode in their routine practice, 9 % point to Intellivent-ASV®, less than 1 % point to PAV + TM (Proportional Assist Ventilation) and nobody point to NAVA (Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist) and Smart Care®. Over half of respondents (62 %) from clinicians who have access to this technology pointed to the lack of knowledge about closed loop modes; 60 % pointed to insufficient education and 40 % pointed to the lack of equipment. These facts demonstrate the necessity of additional educational programs for implementation of modern technologies in practice, need for organization of post customer service for respirators and provision of consumables in some hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: this questionnaire showed that 85 % of practitioners have heard about closed-loop ventilation modes, and half of them had access to these technologies in routine practice, but just 30 % regularly use one of these technologies.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Subject

Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medical Services

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3