Legal regulations of errors and complications in anesthesiology and intensive care in Russian Federation: a review

Author:

Gorbachev Vladimir I.1ORCID,Netesin E. S.1ORCID,Itygilov M. Yu.1ORCID,Gorbachev S. V.1ORCID,Utkin N. N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Irkutsk, Russia

Abstract

The literature review reflects the existing approaches to the structural organization of medical care in Russia and its provision with regulatory legal acts. A critical analysis of the list of medical services in the profile of anesthesiology and intensive care is being carried out, which requires significant adjustments and optimization. A variant of the formation and structuring of medical services as a purposeful concretized process of medical care is proposed. Various options for the development of the classification of complications of anesthesia and intensive care are presented. The paper substantiates the urgent need to form a database of various complications and adverse reactions of anesthesia and intensive care, which currently does not exist, as there are no official documents regulating and obliging to conduct this monitoring, and some documents on this issue are related exclusively to the undesirable effects of drugs.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Subject

Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Ten years of the Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology

2. Qualität anästhesiologischer Gutachten bei medizinischen Schadensfällen

3. Евдокимов Е.А., Лихванцев В.В., Виноградов В.Л. Безопасность больного в анестезиологии. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2009; 3: 4–9. [Yevdokimov Ye.A., Likhvantsev V.V., Vinogradov V.L. Bezopasnost’ bol’nogo v anesteziologii. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2009; 3: 4–9. (In Russ)]

4. On the complications and consequences of intensive care

5. Medication error in anaesthesia and critical care: A cause for concern

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determining Official Scopus Journal Quartile: Why SCImago SJR Is Not Appropriate;Science Management: Theory and Practice;2023-09-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3