Development and testing of the Russian version of Postoperative Quality of Recovery score — the QoR-40 and its short form — QoR-15

Author:

Nikitina Tatiana P.1ORCID,Kulikov A. Yu.1ORCID,Mishina A. A.2ORCID,Sidorov D. D.2ORCID,Ionova T. I.1ORCID,Efremov S. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russia

2. Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. To assess the postoperative quality of recovery, patient-completed questionnaires are used in clinical practice and scientific research. OBJECTIVES. To create and test Russian versions of postoperative quality of recovery questionnaires QoR-40 and QoR-15. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adult patients with thyroid pathology and hyperparathyroidism undergoing elective surgery were enrolled into the study. Linguistic and cultural adaptation were performed in accordance with international guidelines. The external validity of the Russian versions of the questionnaires was assessed upon the results of patients cognitive interviewing. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to changes in time of Russian versions of QoR-40 and QoR-15 were assessed. RESULTS. Overall 144 surgical patients were included in study. The external validity coefficient was 0.96 for QoR-40 and 0.94 for QoR-15. The differences in reproducibility were not significant (p > 0.05) for QoR-40 (180.5 and 184.9) and for QoR-15 (120.0 and 119.0). The Cronbach-α coefficient values were 0.92 (high internal consistency) and 0.89 (good internal consistency) for the QoR-40 and QoR-15 questionnaires, respectively. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the Total score of the questionnaire and the Global recovery by VAS was 0.672 (p < 0.001) and 0.669 (p < 0.001) for QoR-40 and QoR-15, respectively. Patients with low level of postoperative recovery (< 70 scores according to VAS) had lower Total scores of QoR-40 and QoR-15, then patients with high postoperative recovery (≥ 70 by VAS): 165.2 vs 186.2; 98.1 vs 134.8 respectively (p < 0.001). Both tools are sensitive to changes in patients’ condition after surgery: Total scores of QoR-40 and QoR-15 were significantly lower after surgery as compared to baseline scores: 186.4 vs 181.1 by QoR-40 (p < 0.001), 133.8 vs 124.9 by QoR-15 (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS. The Russian versions of QoR-40 and QoR-15 are reliable, valid and sensitive tools for assessing the postoperative quality of patient recovery and may be used in both research studies and clinical practice.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Subject

Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3