Affiliation:
1. FSBEI HE Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
2. MAH I City Clinical Hospital № 40
Abstract
Introduction. Prostate cancer remains the most common urological malignancy, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most effective treatment option. Special conditions for operation (Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum) increase the airway pressure and reduce functional residual capacity of the lungs. Objectives. Review of risk factors for disorders and various interventions to improve pulmonary function and reduce the adverse physiological effects of RARP under general anesthesia. Materials and methods. This review of literature was conducted using the PubMed search engine in electronic databases Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and others up to May 2019. Results. A total of 22 studies were searched, including 9 randomized controlled trials. The factor that could worsen gas exchange during RARP was the body mass index < 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. It is possible to improve gas exchange by means of recruitment maneuvers. Positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O improves oxygenation but requires alertness in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conclusions. The main risk factors for perioperative respiratory and oxygenation disorders in RARP are pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. The effectiveness of ventilation regimes for the prevention of gas exchange disorders has not been proven. Using the recruitment maneuver and increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure does not improve the respiratory function of the lungs. Further studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of RARP.
Publisher
Practical Medicine Publishing House
Reference55 articles.
1. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(1): 7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21442
2. Каприн А.Д., Старински В.В., Петрова Г.В. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2017 году. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена - филиал ФГБУ "НМИЦ радиологии" Минздрава России; 2018: 236 с. [Kaprin A.D., Stariski V.V., Petrova G.V. Status of cancer care to the population of Russia in 2017. Moscow: P. Hertsen MORI - branch of the FSBI NMRRC MH RF; 2018: 236 p. (in Russ)]
3. Yonekura H., Hirate H., Sobue K. Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2016; 35: 281-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.014
4. HuJ.C., Nelson R.A., Wilson T.G., et al. Perioperative Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006; 175(20): 541-546. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00156-4
5. Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Rocco B., et al. Early Complication Rates in a Single-Surgeon Series of 2500 Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomies: Report Applying a Standardized Grading System. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(6): 945-952. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献