Сравнительная оценка прогностической способности шкал органной дисфункции pSOFA, PELOD 2 и Phoenix Sepsis Score у детей с сепсисом: ретроспективное наблюдательное исследование

Author:

Миронов П. И.ORCID,Александрович Юрий СтаниславовичORCID,Трембач А. В.ORCID,Пшениснов К. В.ORCID,Лекманов А. У.ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To date, there remains an urgent need to identify clinical data that can serve as valid criteria for diagnosing sepsis in children, applicable both in global settings and in situations reflecting different clinical situations. In 2024 society critical care medicine USA experts presented the Phoenix Score Sepsis scale for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: A comparative assessment of the discriminatory ability of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) и Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) 2 and Phoenix Sepsis Score scales for sepsis in children in the healthcare t of the Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study design: retrospective, observational, multicenter. Inclusion criteria: children over 9 months of age. under 17 years of age who have been diagnosed with septic shock. The end point of the study was 28-day mortality. Demographic and clinical data are presented as median values with interquartile ranges of means and standard deviations. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The discriminatory power of the scales was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: In the first 24 hours of hospitalization, the prognosis of survival in children with sepsis was comparable for the scales studied. None of the scoring systems were able to predict disease outcomes in shock. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies have shown that in Russian conditions the information value of the Phoenix Sepsis Score scale is comparable to the pSOFA and PELOD 2 scales. Therefore, it seems rational to use all these scales, although the Phoenix Score Sepsis system must still undergo additional external international validation in countries with limited funding.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3