Abstract
Biometric technologies or biometrics are becoming widespread, and, in many ways, they help to make human life easier. As this new technology has a significant impact on not just humans but also nonhuman nature, the authors perceive that there is a need of utmost importance to deal with the evaluation of the impact from the point of view of ethics, especially environmental ethics. The article is based mainly on an interdisciplinary approach, namely, a theoretical analysis of biometric technologies from the point of view of the two most significant approaches to argumentation in environmental ethics: anthropocentric and nonanthropocentric. The study will analyze the results of empirical research conducted among consumers in Slovakia in the years (2023-2024). The authors also base the analysis on relevant empirical data, presenting their own research on consumers’ subjective perceptions of the risks and benefits of biometrics. The authors conclude that it is essential to consider subjective and objective anthropocentric arguments and nonanthropocentric arguments for and against biometrics to understand the broader consequences of this technology.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego
Reference51 articles.
1. Abomhara, Mohamed, Sule Yildirim Yayilgan, Livinus Obiora Nweke, and Zoltán Székely. 2021. “A Comparison of Primary Stakeholders’ Views on the Deployment of Biometric Technologies in Border Management: Case Study of Smart mobILity at the European Land Borders.” Technology in Society 64(February): 101484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101484.
2. Al Solami, Eesa. 2018. “Analysis of Biometric Technology Adaption and Acceptance in Canada.” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 9(3): 392–396. https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090352.
3. Albalawi, Shoroog, Lama Alshahrani, Nouf Albalawi, Reem Kilabi, and A’aeshah Alhakamy. 2022. “A Comprehensive Overview on Biometric Authentication Systems Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 13 (4): 782–91. https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130491.
4. Alsaadi, Israa. 2015. “Physiological Biometric Authentication Systems, Advantages, Disadvantages and Future Development: A Review.” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 4(12): 285-289.
5. Alsaadi, Israa. 2021. “Study on Most Popular Behavioral Biometrics, Advantages, Disadvantages and Recent Applications : A Review.” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 10(01): 15-21.