Abstract
There is a widely debated issue regarding the status and impact of exponentially growing artificial intelligence. The article deals with the problem of the moral agency of animals, and artificial intelligence. The author addresses several criteria for moral agents and tries to find the answer to the question of whether we can treat animals and AI as moral agents. The author uses mostly method of philosophical analysis and comparative method. The author claims that moral agency is not a necessary condition for moral status and doubts the practicality of attributing full moral agency to animals and AI. Moreover, claims that moral agency comes in degrees and different kinds and therefore we have to consider the complex nature of moral agency when dealing with moral actions. For instance, even human moral agents are not all on the same level of development as suggested not just by empirical evidence but also virtue ethics.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego
Reference43 articles.
1. Baum, Seth D., and Andrea Owe. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence Needs Environmental Ethics.” Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(1):139-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2076538.
2. Behdadi, Dorna. 2021. “A Practice-Focused Case for Animal Moral Agency.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38: 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12486.
3. Bringsjord, Selmer, and Han Xiao. 2000. “A Refutation of Penrose’s Gödelian Case Against Artificial Intelligence.” In: Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12: 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130050111455
4. Bringsjord, Selmer, and Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence/
5. ChatGPT, Prompt: “Are you a moral agent?” Accessed January 29, 2023. https://chat.openai.com/auth/login?next=%2Fc%2F5aa8bd43-4190-40dd-91b1-9b018b41c7f3.