Author:
Wang Xiaoting,Shen Peilong,Palečková Iveta
Abstract
This paper focuses on the impact of Chinese and US monetary policy on the net financial assets value of macro balance sheet from both theoretical and empirical aspects and reveals the sectoral solvency risk conduction path based on the balance sheet channel. In addition, the paper is focused on the effects of the interest rate as a target tool for monetary policy on the macro net financial assets. In the theoretical analysis, the net present value model of the economy is constructed, and a general equilibrium model representing the relationship between the real interest rate and net asset value of five sectors is derived (government, financial, resident, enterprise and central bank sector). This model explains the basic principle how interest rates affect net financial assets values. The dataset includes the central bank, commercial banks and shadow banks, and the stock and equity liabilities of the debtor are taken as the net asset of financial institutions during the period 2000–2016. The empirical results show that an increase in the real deposit interest rate improves the net financial assets value of the four sectors, and an increase in the real loan interest rate reduces the net financial assets value of the four sectors, while the effect of the real loan interest rate is greater than the real deposit interest rate. The effect ranking of interest rates on the four sectors is financial, enterprise, government, and resident sector. Overall, loose monetary policies can reduce macro-financial risks through the balance sheet channel, while the negative effects of long-term low-interest policies should be prevented; the macro-policies should hedge sectoral risks triggered by the exit of the easing policy via the macro balance sheet channel.
Publisher
Technical University of Liberec
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Business and International Management
Reference40 articles.
1. Macro Risk Premium and Intermediary Balance Sheet Quantities;Adrian;IMF Economic Review,2010
2. Baharumshah, A., Soon, S-V., & Lauc, E. (2017). Fiscal sustainability in an emerging market economy: When does public debt turn bad? Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.11.002
3. Barrett, P. (2018). Interest-Growth Differentials and Debt Limits in Advanced Economies (IMF Working Paper No. 18/82). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
4. Benigno, P., Eggertsson, G. B., & Romei, F. (2016). Dynamic debt deleveraging and optimal monetary policy. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(2), 310-350. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160124
5. Berge, T. J., & Cao, G. (2014). Global effects of US monetary policy: is unconventional policy different. Economic Review, Q I, 5-31
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献