Abstract
In this commentary, we discuss Tom Cochrane’s theory of emotions. Cochrane offers an appealingly unified account of valent representations, ranging from simple responses to complex representations within a mechanistic framework. This offers some guidance as to how we might conceive of emotions as simple action-guiding responses in infants and animals, as well as context-sensitive evaluative states. While Cochrane argues for the centrality of bodily feelings, he does not consider his approach to be embodied in the narrower sense. We question his reasons and suggest to think of emotions as embodied action-oriented representations. We, furthermore, suggest developing the approach with regard to the multiple roles that social norms play, and delve further into the nuanced relationship between bodily self-regulation and the formative influence of social norms on emotions.
Publisher
Society for Philosophy of Emotion
Reference12 articles.
1. Chaplin, Tara M., Pamela M. Cole, and Carolyn Zahn-Waxler. 2005. “Parental Socialization of Emotion Expression: Gender Differences and Relations to Child Adjustment.” Emotion 5 (1): 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.80.
2. Cochrane, Tom. 2018. The Emotional Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Crivelli, Carlos and Maria Gendron. 2017. “Facial Expressions and Emotions in Indigenous Societies.” In The Science of Facial Expression, edited by James A. Russell and Jose Miguel Fernández Dols, 497–515. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Crockford, Catherine, Roman M. Wittig, Roger Mundry, and Klaus Zuberbühler. 2012. “Wild Chimpanzees Inform Ignorant Group Members of Danger.” Current Biology 22 (2): 142–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.053.
5. Damasio, Antonio. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London, UK: Vintage.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献