Evaluation of extruded roughage with different additives in sheep diet
-
Published:2021-12-22
Issue:
Volume:44
Page:e53447
-
ISSN:1807-8672
-
Container-title:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Acta Sci. Anim. Sci.
Author:
Assis Tamires Soares de, Schultz Erica BeatrizORCID, Oliveira Karla Alves, Siqueira Marco Túlio Santos, Sousa Luciano Fernandes, Macedo Junior Gilberto de Lima
Abstract
The purpose was to evaluate the effect of extruded roughage Foragge® with different additives on intake, digestibility nutrients and nitrogen balance of sheep. Twenty adults, non-pregnant ewes with average weight 68 kg were used. The treatments were extruded roughage with additives (essential oil, virginiamycin, unpurified inactive yeast, tannin and purified inactive yeast). The design was in randomized blocks. The means were contrasted by SNK test, and the fecal score was tested by the Kruskal Wallis test (1952), at 5% significance. There was no difference in the intake of dry matter, crude protein, nitrogen, water, water in relation to dry matter, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (p > 0.05). As well as the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber, the fecal weight, fecal nitrogen, retained nitrogen and nitrogen retained in relation to nitrogen ingested (p > 0.05). However, dry matter intake as a function of body weight and metabolic weight, urinary nitrogen, hemicellulose intake, and hemicellulose as a function of NDF, were higher in the Foragge Factor® treatment (p < 0.05). The inclusion of different additives in the extruded roughage improved nutritional parameters, without causing disturbances.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Maringa
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference31 articles.
1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. (1990). Official methods of analysis. Arlington, VA: AOAC 2. Cameron, M. R., Klusmeyer, T. H., Lynch, G. L., Clark, J. H., & Nelson, D. R. (1991). Effects of urea and starch on rumen fermentation, nutrient passage to the duodenum, and performance of cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(4), 1321-1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78288-X 3. Fereli, F., Branco, A. F., Jobim, C. C., Coneglian, S. M., Granzotto, F., & Barreto, J. C. (2010). Monensina sódica e Saccharomyces cerevisiae em dietas para bovinos: fermentação ruminal, digestibilidade dos nutrientes e eficiência de síntese microbiana. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(1), 183-190. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000100024 4. Ferreira, V. S., Lima, A. G. D., Pessoa, C. S., Paz, F. S. S., & Jesus, J. (2013). Estudo comparativo das enteroparasitoses ocorrentes em duas áreas de Barreiras, Bahia. Natureza on line, 11(2), 90-95. Retrieved on Jan. 2, 2019 from http://www.naturezaonline.com.br/natureza/conteudo/pdf/04_FerreiraVSetal_090095.pdf 5. Figueiroa, F. J. F., Branco, A. F., Barreto, J. C., Carvalho, S. T., Granzotto, F., Oliveira, M. V. M., & Goes, R. H. T. B. (2015). Cultura de leveduras na digestibilidade in vitro de dietas com diferentes proporções de volumosos. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 16(2), 169-178. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v16i216565
|
|