Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Although the United States national innovation system has produced many technologies, their benefits are not evenly distributed across the country’s population. This stands in direct contrast to the aims of government, which frequently funds science research for the purpose of social benefit. This paper first undertakes a deep reconsideration of the US national innovation system, and then reframes it as a collective impact initiative in order to coordinate every one of its contributors around this goal. It begins by tracing the origins of the longstanding tensions between science undertaken for the sakes of science inquiry versus societal benefit. It then discusses the inadequacies of practices meant to bridge science outcomes and societal needs like the broader impacts and technology transfer. It concludes by proposing a significant expansion of the stakeholders that evaluate the proposals and outcomes of federally funded research. This integrates diverse public participation into the proposal selection process, research discussions, and technology transfer to ensure that universal social impact is routinely considered.
Publisher
Journal of Science Policy and Governance, Inc.
Reference59 articles.
1. Alakent, Ekin, M. Sinan Goktan, and Theodore A. Khoury. 2020. “Is Venture Capital Socially Responsible? Exploring the Imprinting Effect of VC Funding on CSR Practices.” Journal of Business Venturing 35 (3): 106005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106005.
2. Ambrose, Mitch. 2021. “Science Committee Makes Counterproposal to Endless Frontier Act.” American Institute of Physics, March 26, 2021. https://www.aip.org/fyi/2021/science-committee-makes-counterproposal-endless-frontier-act.
3. Bozeman, Barry. 2020. “Public Value Science.” Issues in Science and Technology 36 (4). https://issues.org/public-value-science-innovation-equity-bozeman.
4. Bozeman, Barry, and Craig Boardman. 2009. “Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives: Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts.” Social Epistemology 23 (3–4): 183–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720903364019.
5. Bush, Vannevar. 1945. “Science, The Endless Frontier.” Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 48 (3): 231. https://doi.org/10.2307/3625196.