Abstract
The “Science and Policy - How to Bridge the Gap” summer school, which took place in July 2023 in Switzerland, aimed to educate PhD students in natural science and engineering on engaging with policymakers effectively. Over the course of five days, the program covered various aspects of the Swiss and international science-policy interface, including the Science for Policy framework, concrete examples of evidence-based policy advice from scientists, and talks on the significance of Open Science (OS) and public engagement in fostering the dialogue between science and society. Additionally, multiple workshops illustrated science communication formats for different audiences, such as policymakers, stakeholders, and the general public. Organized by five PhD students with a natural science and/or engineering background, the event brought together thirty participants and featured twenty-eight speakers, creating a highly international and stimulating learning environment.
This workshop review, written by the summer school organizers, summarizes the school’s outcomes and aims to provide valuable insights for early-career scientists and engineers taking their first steps in science-informed policymaking. The roles scientists may play at the science-policy interface, the various meeting points (physical and ideological) to interact with decision-makers, tools for more effective communication with non-expert audiences, and the importance of OS and Citizen Science (CS) in integrating scientific information more widely into society are discussed. Based on the participants’ feedback, suggestions are also offered for future events on science and policy, which early-career researchers can implement in their respective universities and countries. Given the strong commitment of participants and their desire to create a community, the authors believe such workshops are essential to give early-career scientists the tools and network to actively engage in the science-policy landscape.
Publisher
Journal of Science Policy and Governance, Inc.
Reference24 articles.
1. Amman, O, D Farman, S Grüninger, S Maier, and R Wyss. 2023. ‘Qui est entendu? Communauté scientifique et auditions des commissions thématiques du Parlement.’ Swiss Academies Communications 18 (3).
2. Ancion, Zoé, Lidia Borrell-Damián, Pierre Mounier, Johan Rooryck, and Bregt Saenen. 2022. ‘Action Plan for Diamond Open Access’, March. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6282403.
3. Blastland, Michael, Alexandra L. J. Freeman, Sander van der Linden, Theresa M. Marteau, and David Spiegelhalter. 2020. ‘Five Rules for Evidence Communication’. Nature 587 (7834): 362–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03189-1.
4. Bonney, Rick, Tina Phillips, Heidi Ballard, and Jody Enck. 2015. ‘Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science?’ Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 25 (October). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406.
5. Hajdu, Marton, and Catherine Simoneau. 2020. ‘Chapter 15 - Communicating Science in a Policy Context to a Broader Audience’. In Science for Policy Handbook, edited by Vladimír Šucha and Marta Sienkiewicz, 166–79. Elsevier.