To identify priorities in science and technology

Author:

Matsaberidze Mamuka,Kerkadze Jimsher,Janelidze Inga,Jandieri Gigo

Abstract

The sectoral priorities of science and technology determine the socioeconomic factors of the growth of states, which in turn provides for the system components of public safety. The most important components of all sectoral priorities are synergistic-hybrid technologies, i.e. such technologies that are formed in the field of inter-sectoral competence. To solve the problems of determining priorities in the field of synergistic-hybrid technology, the decisive function is the implementation of philosophical understanding of the problem, which is put forward as the main factor in decision making through the key components of sustainable development.

Publisher

Association For Science (Publications)

Reference16 articles.

1. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Edited by Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge National Science Foundation Kluwer Academic Publishers (currently Springer), Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003, 482 p.

2. I. Matyushenko, Dr. Sc. of Economics, Professor, O. Azarenkova, PhD. Department of International Economic Relations, School of International Economic Relations and Travel Business, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine. Organic Combination of Converging Nbic-Technologies and Smart temp Advanced Technologies of Industry 4.0. International Scientific Journal "Industry 4.0", 2019, Year IV, Issue 1, pp. 11-14

3. M.C. Roco and W.S. Bainbridge. Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Kluwer, 2002.

4. James Canton Ph.D. Designing the Future. NBIC Technologies and Human Performance Enhancemen. Institute for Global Futures, San Francisco, California 94123, USA. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9b19/ae6ecd6ae66edc85b257d5e902dcd9838217.pdf

5. R.K. Merton. The Institutional Imperatives of Science. Sociology of Science; Ed. B. Barnes. L.: Penguin Books, 1972; P. 65–79; Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1973, p.p. 267–278

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3