Development and testing of a new instrument to measure self-care in patients with osteoporosis: the self-care of osteoporosis scale-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Development and testing of a new instrument to measure self-care in patients with osteoporosis: the self-care of osteoporosis scale

Published:2021-03-20 Issue:1 Volume:1 Page:28-33
ISSN:2724-4296
Container-title:International Journal of Bone Fragility
language:
Short-container-title:Int J Bone Frag

Author:

Cittadini Noemi¹,D’Angelo Daniela¹,Basilici Zannetti Emanuela¹,Celi Monica²,Pennini Annalisa¹,Rocco Gennaro¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and test the Self-Care of Osteoporosis Scale (SCOS), a new instrument to measure self-care in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The SCOS was developed by a panel of experts and it was theory- driven. Confirmatory factor analysis (N = 544) was used to test the instrument’s factorial validity; Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega were used to derive the measure’s internal consistency reliability; an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate test-retest reliability. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in supportive fit indices for the hypothesized three-factor structure of the SCOS (RMSEA = 0.065; CFI = 0.99). The SCOS was demonstrated to have content validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The SCOS demonstrated excellent psychometric characteristics in terms of validity and reliability. It may be used by healthcare providers to identify if patients show lower self-care and require educational interventions.

Publisher

Medimay Communication

Link

https://www.journalbonefragility.com/wp-content/uploads/journal/2021/1.1/28-33.pdf

Reference40 articles.

1. 1. Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, et al. Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: risk factor updates and societal impact. World J Orthop. 2016;7(3):171-81. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.171

2. 2. Ash AS, Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Hoaglin DC, Christensen K, Fang H, Perls TT. Are members of long-lived families healthier than their equally long-lived peers? Evidence from the Long Life Family Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(8):971-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv015

3. 3. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1-2):136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1

4. 4. Tella SH, Gallagher JC. Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;142:155-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008

5. 5. Pinkerton JV, Thomas S, Dalkin AC. Osteoporosis treatment and prevention for postmenopausal women: current and future therapeutic options. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56(4):711-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182a9fb02

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Factors That Influence Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women With Nonvertebral Fractures;Orthopaedic Nursing;2024-04-07

2. Factors influencing self-care in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: The Guardian Angel® multicentric longitudinal study;Maturitas;2022-07