Affiliation:
1. N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Abstract
Enterobacteriaceae family microorganisms,
specifically E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, are the most
common activators of postoperative peritonitis in oncology.
Many of these microorganisms produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). The deemed resistance of ESBL-producing
enterobacteria to all β-lactam antibiotics, except for carbapenems, leads to ineffectiveness of empiric antibiotic therapy.
Purpose of the study: To define the risk factors of peritoneal contamination with ESBL-producing enterobacteria for
choosing optimal empirical antibacterial therapy on the example of a specific cancer patient with postoperative peritonitis.
Results: Independent risk factors of peritoneal contamination with ESBL-producing enterobacteria included “the administration of antibiotics for more than three days” (OR 106,
95% CI 21.0-537, p<0.001), “two or more relaparotomies”
(OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.32-5.34, p =0.006), and “postoperative
preventive antibiotic treatment” (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.75,
p =0.02). The obtained prognostic model allowed predicting
the infection with ESBL-producing enterobacteria before establishing the postoperative peritonitis microbial etiology.
The model sensitivity was 94.7%, overall predictive accuracy
was 73.1.
Conclusion: Prolonged administration of antibiotics
(3rd-generation cephalosporins and/or fluoroquinolones) after cancer surgery to prevent surgical infections is the main
independent risk factor of peritoneal contamination with
ESBL- producing enterobacteria.
Publisher
Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Шишло И. Ф. Типичные абдоминальные онкологические операции и исход послеоперационного перитонита
2. // Новости хирургии. – 2010. – № 6 (18). – C. 66–74 [Shishlo I.
3. F. Tipichnye abdominal’nye onkologicheskie operacii i isxod
4. posleoperacionnogo peritonita // Novosti xirurgii. – 2010. – № 6
5. (18). – S. 66–74];;